Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSGZX vs WCMLX
MSGZX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts MSGZX vs WCMLX
MassMutual Small Cap Gr Eq I
Price$17.12
Change-$0.56 (-3.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets588.9M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.25
Change-$0.44 (-3.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.88M
MSGZX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSGZX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSGZX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSGZX has more cash in the bank: 589M vs. WCMLX (41.9M). MSGZX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: MSGZX (0.03) vs WCMLX (0.00). MSGZX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: MSGZX (15 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than MSGZX (0.85). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. MSGZX (54.00). MSGZX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: MSGZX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). MSGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.02 vs. WCMLX (-2.98). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 4.74 vs. MSGZX (-4.69).
| MSGZX | WCMLX | MSGZX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.99 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.79 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.609 | 6.454 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 589M | 41.9M | 1,406% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.02 | -2.98 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.32 | 22.89 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.69 | 4.74 | -99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.66 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement