Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSGZX vs NRGSX
MSGZX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts MSGZX vs NRGSX
MassMutual Small Cap Gr Eq I
Price$17.08
Change+$0.18 (+1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets566.85M
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$63.48
Change+$0.48 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.89B
MSGZX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSGZX vs. NRGSX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSGZX is a Buy and NRGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.89B vs. MSGZX (567M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than MSGZX: NRGSX (0.06) vs MSGZX (0.03). MSGZX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: MSGZX (15 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). MSGZX (0.85) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). MSGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). MSGZX (0) and NRGSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MSGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.39 vs. NRGSX (-6.97). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : 7.76 vs. MSGZX (7.01).
| MSGZX | NRGSX | MSGZX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.74 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.74 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.890 | -2.862 | -206% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 567M | 8.89B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 0.06 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.39 | -6.97 | -20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.34 | 12.34 | 359% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.01 | 7.76 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.37 | 17.91 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement