Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSGZX vs NRGSX
MSGZX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts MSGZX vs NRGSX
MassMutual Small Cap Gr Eq I
Price$17.16
Change-$0.04 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets561.82M
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$62.80
Change+$0.25 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.68B
MSGZX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSGZX vs. NRGSX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSGZX is a Buy and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.69B vs. MSGZX (562M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than MSGZX: NRGSX (0.06) vs MSGZX (0.03). MSGZX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: MSGZX (15 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). MSGZX (0.85) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). MSGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). MSGZX (0) and NRGSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MSGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.61 vs. NRGSX (-10.12). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : -2.32 vs. MSGZX (-4.08).
| MSGZX | NRGSX | MSGZX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.74 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.74 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.386 | -3.902 | -164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 562M | 8.69B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 0.06 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.61 | -10.12 | 6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.36 | 5.90 | 633% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.08 | -2.32 | 176% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.67 | 10.24 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers