Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSGUX vs RGACX
MSGUX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MSGUX vs RGACX
Morgan Stanley Inst Growth C
Price$55.29
Change+$0.76 (+1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.75B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$85.78
Change+$1.08 (+1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
MSGUX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSGUX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSGUX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. MSGUX (4.75B). RGACX pays higher dividends than MSGUX: RGACX (0.07) vs MSGUX (0.00). MSGUX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MSGUX (10 years) vs RGACX (23 years). MSGUX (1.62) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). MSGUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSGUX: RGACX (250) vs MSGUX (1000). MSGUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 61.05 vs. RGACX (11.01). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.85 vs. MSGUX (-31.58).
| MSGUX | RGACX | MSGUX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 0.94 | 172% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 0.94 | 172% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.679 | 17.655 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.75B | 337B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 61.05 | 11.01 | 555% |
| Returns for 3 years | 105.31 | 70.57 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.58 | 37.85 | -83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.96 | 96.78 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement