Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSFRX vs RLBAX
MSFRX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts MSFRX vs RLBAX
MFS Total Return A
Price$19.93
Change-$0.05 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.73B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.06
Change-$0.08 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.26B
MSFRX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSFRX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSFRX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. MSFRX (7.73B). MSFRX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: MSFRX (2.33) vs RLBAX (1.17). MSFRX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: MSFRX (55 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than MSFRX (0.72). MSFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSFRX: RLBAX (250) vs MSFRX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.15 vs. MSFRX (1.21). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.77 vs. MSFRX (10.68).
| MSFRX | RLBAX | MSFRX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.31 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.31 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 55 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.905 | 9.243 | 75% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.73B | 256B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.33 | 1.17 | 199% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.21 | 7.15 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.32 | 27.06 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.68 | 33.77 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.85 | 59.12 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement