Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSFRX vs RLBAX
MSFRX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts MSFRX vs RLBAX
MFS Total Return A
Price$19.24
Change-$0.17 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.55B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$35.31
Change-$0.31 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.39B
MSFRX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSFRX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSFRX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 244B vs. MSFRX (7.55B). MSFRX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: MSFRX (2.35) vs RLBAX (1.23). MSFRX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: MSFRX (55 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than MSFRX (0.72). MSFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSFRX: RLBAX (250) vs MSFRX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.45 vs. MSFRX (0.46). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.05 vs. MSFRX (12.33).
| MSFRX | RLBAX | MSFRX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.31 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.31 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 55 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.784 | 4.085 | 68% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.55B | 244B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.35 | 1.23 | 191% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.46 | 4.45 | 10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.44 | 30.02 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.33 | 34.05 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.70 | 51.23 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement