Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSFKX vs RLBEX
MSFKX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts MSFKX vs RLBEX
MFS Total Return R6
Price$19.94
Change+$0.03 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.74B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$37.13
Change+$0.07 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets254.37B
MSFKX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSFKX vs. RLBEX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSFKX is a StrongBuy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. MSFKX (7.74B). MSFKX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: MSFKX (2.62) vs RLBEX (1.83). MSFKX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: MSFKX (13 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). RLBEX (0.59) is less costly to investors than MSFKX (0.40). MSFKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). MSFKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: MSFKX (0) vs RLBEX (250). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.25 vs. MSFKX (2.95). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.56 vs. MSFKX (14.51).
| MSFKX | RLBEX | MSFKX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.59 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.59 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.970 | 9.003 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.74B | 254B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.62 | 1.83 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.95 | 10.25 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.44 | 34.68 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.51 | 39.56 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.23 | 67.20 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement