Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSFKX vs RLBEX
MSFKX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts MSFKX vs RLBEX
MFS Total Return R6
Price$20.14
Change-$0.12 (-0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.68B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$38.99
Change-$0.49 (-1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
MSFKX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSFKX vs. RLBEX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSFKX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. MSFKX (7.68B). MSFKX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: MSFKX (2.68) vs RLBEX (1.71). MSFKX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: MSFKX (13 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). RLBEX (0.59) is less costly to investors than MSFKX (0.40). MSFKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). MSFKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: MSFKX (0) vs RLBEX (250). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.94 vs. MSFKX (-0.09). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 41.28 vs. MSFKX (9.44).
| MSFKX | RLBEX | MSFKX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.59 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.59 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.748 | 16.221 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.68B | 269B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.68 | 1.71 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.09 | 9.94 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.38 | 43.51 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.44 | 41.28 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.98 | 80.23 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement