Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSFHX vs RLBAX
MSFHX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts MSFHX vs RLBAX
MFS Total Return R3
Price$19.97
Change+$0.04 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.74B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$36.83
Change+$0.08 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets254.37B
MSFHX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSFHX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSFHX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. MSFHX (7.74B). MSFHX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: MSFHX (2.31) vs RLBAX (1.18). MSFHX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: MSFHX (20 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than MSFHX (0.72). MSFHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). MSFHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: MSFHX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.42 vs. MSFHX (2.66). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.28 vs. MSFHX (12.75).
| MSFHX | RLBAX | MSFHX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.31 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.31 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.787 | 8.565 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.74B | 254B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.31 | 1.18 | 196% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.66 | 9.42 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.44 | 32.14 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.75 | 35.28 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.84 | 58.06 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers