Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSFFX vs RLBAX
MSFFX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts MSFFX vs RLBAX
MFS Total Return R1
Price$19.81
Change+$0.04 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.74B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$36.52
Change+$0.17 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.39B
MSFFX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSFFX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSFFX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. MSFFX (7.74B). MSFFX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: MSFFX (1.60) vs RLBAX (1.18). MSFFX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: MSFFX (20 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). MSFFX (1.47) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). MSFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). MSFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: MSFFX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.00 vs. MSFFX (2.95). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.04 vs. MSFFX (10.73).
| MSFFX | RLBAX | MSFFX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.31 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.31 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.825 | 7.651 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.74B | 252B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 1.18 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.95 | 7.00 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.93 | 32.45 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.73 | 37.04 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.85 | 58.01 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement