Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSEPX vs RNWBX
MSEPX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts MSEPX vs RNWBX
Morgan Stanley Inst Emerging Mkts C
Price$12.96
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets128.45M
American Funds New World R2
Price$92.29
Change-$0.25 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
MSEPX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSEPX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSEPX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. MSEPX (128M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than MSEPX: RNWBX (0.48) vs MSEPX (0.01). MSEPX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: MSEPX (11 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). MSEPX (3.13) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). MSEPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSEPX: RNWBX (250) vs MSEPX (1000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.41 vs. MSEPX (-33.26). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.47 vs. MSEPX (-51.21).
| MSEPX | RNWBX | MSEPX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.67 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.13 | 1.67 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.516 | 4.294 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128M | 75.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.48 | 1% |
| Returns for 1 year | -33.26 | 28.41 | -117% |
| Returns for 3 years | -28.79 | 38.40 | -75% |
| Returns for 5 years | -51.21 | 7.47 | -685% |
| Returns for 10 years | -22.35 | 112.28 | -20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement