Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSCMX vs RGEBX
MSCMX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts MSCMX vs RGEBX
Morgan Stanley Insight C
Price$17.02
Change+$0.14 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.49B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$80.73
Change+$0.27 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
MSCMX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSCMX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSCMX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. MSCMX (1.49B). MSCMX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: MSCMX (1.26) vs RGEBX (0.00). MSCMX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: MSCMX (10 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). MSCMX (1.90) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). MSCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSCMX: RGEBX (250) vs MSCMX (1000). MSCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 72.56 vs. RGEBX (16.90). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.14 vs. MSCMX (-61.31).
| MSCMX | RGEBX | MSCMX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 1.09 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 1.09 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.056 | 13.004 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.49B | 328B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 72.56 | 16.90 | 429% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.89 | 55.95 | -2% |
| Returns for 5 years | -61.31 | 45.14 | -136% |
| Returns for 10 years | -43.42 | 78.81 | -55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement