MSCI
Price
$555.15
Change
-$2.04 (-0.37%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
42.95B
52 days until earnings call
NDAQ
Price
$93.48
Change
-$0.82 (-0.87%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
53.64B
39 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MSCI vs NDAQ

Header iconMSCI vs NDAQ Comparison
Open Charts MSCI vs NDAQBanner chart's image
MSCI
Price$555.15
Change-$2.04 (-0.37%)
Volume$626.84K
Capitalization42.95B
Nasdaq
Price$93.48
Change-$0.82 (-0.87%)
Volume$3.77M
Capitalization53.64B
MSCI vs NDAQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MSCI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NDAQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MSCI vs. NDAQ commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSCI is a Hold and NDAQ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MSCI: $555.15 vs. NDAQ: $93.48)
Brand notoriety: MSCI and NDAQ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MSCI: 84% vs. NDAQ: 124%
Market capitalization -- MSCI: $42.95B vs. NDAQ: $53.64B
MSCI [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $42.95B. NDAQ’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $53.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $164.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $30.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MSCI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNDAQ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MSCI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NDAQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSCI is a better buy in the long-term than NDAQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MSCI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NDAQ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MSCI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NDAQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NDAQ is a better buy in the short-term than MSCI.

Price Growth

MSCI (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -2.21% price change this week, while NDAQ (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -1.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

MSCI is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (-1.40% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NDAQ($53.6B) has a higher market cap than MSCI($42.9B). MSCI (36.79) and NDAQ (35.95) have similar P/E ratio . NDAQ YTD gains are higher at: 21.697 vs. MSCI (-6.596). MSCI has less debt than NDAQ: MSCI (4.63B) vs NDAQ (9.63B).
MSCINDAQMSCI / NDAQ
Capitalization42.9B53.6B80%
EBITDAN/A2.83B-
Gain YTD-6.59621.697-30%
P/E Ratio36.7935.95102%
RevenueN/A8.11B-
Total CashN/A2.01B-
Total Debt4.63B9.63B48%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MSCI vs NDAQ: Fundamental Ratings
MSCI
NDAQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5356
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5316
SMR RATING
1..100
859
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5947
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5671
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MSCI's Valuation (5) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NDAQ (63) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that MSCI’s stock grew somewhat faster than NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MSCI (53) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than MSCI’s over the last 12 months.

MSCI's SMR Rating (8) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NDAQ (59) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that MSCI’s stock grew somewhat faster than NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MSCI (59) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to MSCI’s over the last 12 months.

MSCI's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as NDAQ (71) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that MSCI’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MSCINDAQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MSCI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NDAQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BHK9.790.10
+1.03%
Blackrock Core BD TR
OVB20.760.10
+0.50%
Overlay Shares Core Bond ETF
FNDF42.200.17
+0.40%
Schwab Fundamental International Eq ETF
CZA109.500.13
+0.12%
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
DMAX26.270.02
+0.08%
iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Dec ETF

MSCI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSCI has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MSCI jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSCI
1D Price
Change %
MSCI100%
-0.37%
MCO - MSCI
67%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
MORN - MSCI
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
SPGI - MSCI
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
NDAQ - MSCI
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
FDS - MSCI
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
More

NDAQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDAQ has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDAQ jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NDAQ
1D Price
Change %
NDAQ100%
-0.87%
MCO - NDAQ
77%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
MS - NDAQ
70%
Closely correlated
-1.62%
JEF - NDAQ
70%
Closely correlated
-2.26%
GS - NDAQ
69%
Closely correlated
-1.43%
RJF - NDAQ
69%
Closely correlated
-3.27%
More