MSCI
Price
$565.35
Change
+$0.69 (+0.12%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
43.69B
32 days until earnings call
NDAQ
Price
$87.50
Change
+$0.77 (+0.89%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
49.77B
19 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MSCI vs NDAQ

Header iconMSCI vs NDAQ Comparison
Open Charts MSCI vs NDAQBanner chart's image
MSCI
Price$565.35
Change+$0.69 (+0.12%)
Volume$3.56K
Capitalization43.69B
Nasdaq
Price$87.50
Change+$0.77 (+0.89%)
Volume$52.54K
Capitalization49.77B
MSCI vs NDAQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MSCI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NDAQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MSCI vs. NDAQ commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSCI is a Buy and NDAQ is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (MSCI: $565.35 vs. NDAQ: $87.50)
Brand notoriety: MSCI and NDAQ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MSCI: 10% vs. NDAQ: 20%
Market capitalization -- MSCI: $43.69B vs. NDAQ: $49.77B
MSCI [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $43.69B. NDAQ’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $49.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $148.05B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $29.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MSCI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNDAQ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MSCI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NDAQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSCI is a better buy in the long-term than NDAQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MSCI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NDAQ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MSCI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NDAQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NDAQ is a better buy in the short-term than MSCI.

Price Growth

MSCI (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а +1.00% price change this week, while NDAQ (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -2.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -1.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

MSCI is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (-1.02% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NDAQ($49.8B) has a higher market cap than MSCI($43.7B). MSCI has higher P/E ratio than NDAQ: MSCI (37.42) vs NDAQ (33.36). NDAQ YTD gains are higher at: 14.234 vs. MSCI (-4.880). MSCI has less debt than NDAQ: MSCI (4.63B) vs NDAQ (9.63B).
MSCINDAQMSCI / NDAQ
Capitalization43.7B49.8B88%
EBITDA1.83BN/A-
Gain YTD-4.88014.234-34%
P/E Ratio37.4233.36112%
Revenue2.99BN/A-
Total Cash344MN/A-
Total Debt4.63B9.63B48%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MSCI vs NDAQ: Fundamental Ratings
MSCI
NDAQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5462
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5520
SMR RATING
1..100
858
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5755
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4774
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MSCI's Valuation (9) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NDAQ (56) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that MSCI’s stock grew somewhat faster than NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MSCI (55) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than MSCI’s over the last 12 months.

MSCI's SMR Rating (8) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NDAQ (58) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that MSCI’s stock grew somewhat faster than NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MSCI (57) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to MSCI’s over the last 12 months.

MSCI's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as NDAQ (74) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that MSCI’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MSCINDAQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MSCI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NDAQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IDX16.090.29
+1.84%
VanEck Indonesia ETF
AVUV100.551.11
+1.12%
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
SPE15.550.08
+0.55%
Special Opportunities Fund
NXP14.41-0.18
-1.22%
Nuveen Select Tax-Free
RVNL42.33-0.81
-1.87%
GraniteShares 2x Long RIVN Daily ETF

MSCI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSCI has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MSCI jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSCI
1D Price
Change %
MSCI100%
+0.12%
MCO - MSCI
68%
Closely correlated
+0.81%
MORN - MSCI
66%
Closely correlated
+1.38%
SPGI - MSCI
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
NDAQ - MSCI
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.89%
TRU - MSCI
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
More

NDAQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDAQ has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDAQ jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NDAQ
1D Price
Change %
NDAQ100%
+0.89%
MCO - NDAQ
77%
Closely correlated
+0.81%
MS - NDAQ
70%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
JEF - NDAQ
70%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
SPGI - NDAQ
70%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
GS - NDAQ
69%
Closely correlated
+1.04%
More