MSCI
Price
$535.22
Change
+$4.62 (+0.87%)
Updated
Apr 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
44.4B
92 days until earnings call
NDAQ
Price
$75.39
Change
+$0.65 (+0.87%)
Updated
Apr 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
36.33B
79 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MSCI vs NDAQ

Header iconMSCI vs NDAQ Comparison
Open Charts MSCI vs NDAQBanner chart's image
MSCI
Price$535.22
Change+$4.62 (+0.87%)
Volume$2.86K
Capitalization44.4B
Nasdaq
Price$75.39
Change+$0.65 (+0.87%)
Volume$38.76K
Capitalization36.33B
MSCI vs NDAQ Comparison Chart
Loading...
MSCI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NDAQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MSCI vs. NDAQ commentary
Apr 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSCI is a Buy and NDAQ is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 28, 2025
Stock price -- (MSCI: $535.36 vs. NDAQ: $75.36)
Brand notoriety: MSCI and NDAQ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MSCI: 81% vs. NDAQ: 84%
Market capitalization -- MSCI: $44.4B vs. NDAQ: $36.33B
MSCI [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $44.4B. NDAQ’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $36.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MSCI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNDAQ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MSCI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NDAQ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSCI is a better buy in the long-term than NDAQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MSCI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NDAQ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MSCI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NDAQ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NDAQ is a better buy in the short-term than MSCI.

Price Growth

MSCI (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -2.11% price change this week, while NDAQ (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +4.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +5.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +137.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

MSCI is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+5.90% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSCI($44.4B) has a higher market cap than NDAQ($36.3B). MSCI has higher P/E ratio than NDAQ: MSCI (38.56) vs NDAQ (29.93). NDAQ YTD gains are higher at: -3.002 vs. MSCI (-11.289). NDAQ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2B vs. MSCI (1.72B). NDAQ has more cash in the bank: 641M vs. MSCI (458M). MSCI has less debt than NDAQ: MSCI (4.63B) vs NDAQ (10.9B). NDAQ has higher revenues than MSCI: NDAQ (6.06B) vs MSCI (2.53B).
MSCINDAQMSCI / NDAQ
Capitalization44.4B36.3B122%
EBITDA1.72B2B86%
Gain YTD-11.289-3.002376%
P/E Ratio38.5629.93129%
Revenue2.53B6.06B42%
Total Cash458M641M71%
Total Debt4.63B10.9B42%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MSCI vs NDAQ: Fundamental Ratings
MSCI
NDAQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1615
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3915
SMR RATING
1..100
868
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5855
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4018
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MSCI's Valuation (86) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as NDAQ (88) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that MSCI’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MSCI (39) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to MSCI’s over the last 12 months.

MSCI's SMR Rating (8) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NDAQ (68) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that MSCI’s stock grew somewhat faster than NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MSCI (58) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to MSCI’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MSCI (40) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to MSCI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MSCINDAQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MSCI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NDAQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA259.518.77
+3.50%
Tesla
SPY546.6911.27
+2.10%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
AAPL208.373.77
+1.84%
Apple
BTC.X93943.800000244.687500
+0.26%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME27.08-0.04
-0.15%
GameStop Corp

MSCI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSCI has been loosely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MSCI jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSCI
1D Price
Change %
MSCI100%
-0.53%
MCO - MSCI
56%
Loosely correlated
+2.05%
FDS - MSCI
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
MORN - MSCI
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.86%
NDAQ - MSCI
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.69%
SPGI - MSCI
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.35%
More

NDAQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDAQ has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDAQ jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NDAQ
1D Price
Change %
NDAQ100%
+1.69%
MCO - NDAQ
74%
Closely correlated
+2.05%
MORN - NDAQ
72%
Closely correlated
+1.86%
SPGI - NDAQ
67%
Closely correlated
+2.35%
MS - NDAQ
66%
Closely correlated
+2.93%
GS - NDAQ
66%
Loosely correlated
+3.03%
More