MSCI
Price
$617.38
Change
+$5.36 (+0.88%)
Updated
Jan 21 closing price
Capitalization
44.4B
7 days until earnings call
NDAQ
Price
$79.87
Change
+$1.04 (+1.32%)
Updated
Jan 21 closing price
Capitalization
36.33B
7 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MSCI vs NDAQ

Header iconMSCI vs NDAQ Comparison
Open Charts MSCI vs NDAQBanner chart's image
MSCI
Price$617.38
Change+$5.36 (+0.88%)
Volume$676.08K
Capitalization44.4B
Nasdaq
Price$79.87
Change+$1.04 (+1.32%)
Volume$1.98M
Capitalization36.33B
MSCI vs NDAQ Comparison Chart
Loading...
MSCI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NDAQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MSCI vs. NDAQ commentary
Jan 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSCI is a Hold and NDAQ is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 22, 2025
Stock price -- (MSCI: $617.38 vs. NDAQ: $79.87)
Brand notoriety: MSCI and NDAQ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MSCI: 155% vs. NDAQ: 78%
Market capitalization -- MSCI: $44.4B vs. NDAQ: $36.33B
MSCI [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $44.4B. NDAQ’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $36.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MSCI’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNDAQ’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MSCI’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NDAQ’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, NDAQ is a better buy in the long-term than MSCI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MSCI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NDAQ’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MSCI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NDAQ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NDAQ is a better buy in the short-term than MSCI.

Price Growth

MSCI (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +5.39% price change this week, while NDAQ (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +4.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +4.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

MSCI is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+4.25% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSCI($44.4B) has a higher market cap than NDAQ($36.3B). MSCI has higher P/E ratio than NDAQ: MSCI (38.56) vs NDAQ (29.93). NDAQ YTD gains are higher at: 3.311 vs. MSCI (2.895). NDAQ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2B vs. MSCI (1.72B). NDAQ has more cash in the bank: 641M vs. MSCI (458M). MSCI has less debt than NDAQ: MSCI (4.63B) vs NDAQ (10.9B). NDAQ has higher revenues than MSCI: NDAQ (6.06B) vs MSCI (2.53B).
MSCINDAQMSCI / NDAQ
Capitalization44.4B36.3B122%
EBITDA1.72B2B86%
Gain YTD2.8953.31187%
P/E Ratio38.5629.93129%
Revenue2.53B6.06B42%
Total Cash458M641M71%
Total Debt4.63B10.9B42%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MSCI vs NDAQ: Fundamental Ratings
MSCI
NDAQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2413
SMR RATING
1..100
866
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3323
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7313
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MSCI's Valuation (92) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as NDAQ (97) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that MSCI’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MSCI (24) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to MSCI’s over the last 12 months.

MSCI's SMR Rating (8) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NDAQ (66) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that MSCI’s stock grew somewhat faster than NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's Price Growth Rating (23) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MSCI (33) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to MSCI’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MSCI (73) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that NDAQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than MSCI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MSCINDAQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MSCI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NDAQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X106146.2660004129.601600
+4.05%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY603.055.47
+0.92%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME27.47-0.04
-0.15%
GameStop Corp
TSLA424.07-2.43
-0.57%
Tesla
AAPL222.64-7.34
-3.19%
Apple

MSCI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSCI has been loosely correlated with SPGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MSCI jumps, then SPGI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSCI
1D Price
Change %
MSCI100%
+0.88%
SPGI - MSCI
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
FDS - MSCI
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
MCO - MSCI
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.87%
MORN - MSCI
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
NDAQ - MSCI
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
More

NDAQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDAQ has been loosely correlated with MORN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NDAQ jumps, then MORN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NDAQ
1D Price
Change %
NDAQ100%
+1.32%
MORN - NDAQ
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
MCO - NDAQ
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.87%
JEF - NDAQ
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.80%
SPGI - NDAQ
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
ICE - NDAQ
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.75%
More