Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSCGX vs NAESX
MSCGX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts MSCGX vs NAESX
Mercer US Small/Mid Cap Equity Y3
Price$11.41
Change+$0.08 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.66B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$116.62
Change+$0.82 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
MSCGX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSCGX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSCGX is a StrongBuy and NAESX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. MSCGX (1.66B). NAESX pays higher dividends than MSCGX: NAESX (1.28) vs MSCGX (0.91). MSCGX was incepted earlier than NAESX: MSCGX (20 years) vs NAESX (65 years). MSCGX (1.01) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). MSCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). MSCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: MSCGX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.22 vs. MSCGX (1.93). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 69.32 vs. MSCGX (22.34).
| MSCGX | NAESX | MSCGX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.17 | 324% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.17 | 594% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.784 | 1.432 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.66B | 148B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 1.28 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.93 | 12.22 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.37 | 37.83 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.34 | 69.32 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.31 | 108.83 | -1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement