Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MSCFX vs NAESX
MSCFX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts MSCFX vs NAESX
Mairs & Power Small Cap
Price$29.23
Change+$0.10 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.08M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$116.62
Change+$0.82 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
MSCFX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MSCFX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSCFX is a Buy and NAESX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. MSCFX (244M). NAESX pays higher dividends than MSCFX: NAESX (1.28) vs MSCFX (0.08). MSCFX was incepted earlier than NAESX: MSCFX (14 years) vs NAESX (65 years). MSCFX (0.94) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). MSCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.41 vs. NAESX (13.00). MSCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: MSCFX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.22 vs. MSCFX (-0.94). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 69.32 vs. MSCFX (33.39).
| MSCFX | NAESX | MSCFX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.17 | 553% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.17 | 553% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.571 | 1.432 | -319% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 244M | 148B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.08 | 1.28 | 7% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.94 | 12.22 | -8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.62 | 37.83 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.39 | 69.32 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.97 | 108.83 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement