MSBC
Price
$95.00
Change
+$0.73 (+0.77%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
27.38M
MZTFF
Price
$34.68
Change
-$1.57 (-4.33%)
Updated
Dec 8 closing price
Capitalization
9.22B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MSBC vs MZTFF

Header iconMSBC vs MZTFF Comparison
Open Charts MSBC vs MZTFFBanner chart's image
Mission Ban
Price$95.00
Change+$0.73 (+0.77%)
Volume$200
Capitalization27.38M
Mizrahi Tefahot Bank
Price$34.68
Change-$1.57 (-4.33%)
Volume$243
Capitalization9.22B
MSBC vs MZTFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MSBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MSBC vs. MZTFF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSBC is a Buy and MZTFF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MSBC: $95.00 vs. MZTFF: $34.68)
Brand notoriety: MSBC and MZTFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MSBC: 18% vs. MZTFF: 100%
Market capitalization -- MSBC: $27.38M vs. MZTFF: $9.22B
MSBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $27.38M. MZTFF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $9.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MSBC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMZTFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MSBC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MZTFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSBC is a better buy in the long-term than MZTFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MSBC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MSBC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

MSBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MZTFF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.73%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.13% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MZTFF($9.22B) has a higher market cap than MSBC($27.4M). MSBC YTD gains are higher at: 5.000 vs. MZTFF (0.000). MSBC has less debt than MZTFF: MSBC (792K) vs MZTFF (34.6B). MZTFF has higher revenues than MSBC: MZTFF (13.9B) vs MSBC (10.1M).
MSBCMZTFFMSBC / MZTFF
Capitalization27.4M9.22B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.0000.000-
P/E RatioN/A9.81-
Revenue10.1M13.9B0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt792K34.6B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MSBC vs MZTFF: Fundamental Ratings
MSBC
MZTFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
121
SMR RATING
1..100
324
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5672
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
28100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a45

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MZTFF's Valuation (56) in the null industry is in the same range as MSBC (76). This means that MZTFF’s stock grew similarly to MSBC’s over the last 12 months.

MZTFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as MSBC (12). This means that MZTFF’s stock grew similarly to MSBC’s over the last 12 months.

MZTFF's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as MSBC (32). This means that MZTFF’s stock grew similarly to MSBC’s over the last 12 months.

MSBC's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as MZTFF (72). This means that MSBC’s stock grew similarly to MZTFF’s over the last 12 months.

MSBC's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MZTFF (100). This means that MSBC’s stock grew significantly faster than MZTFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MSBCMZTFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
29%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
24%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
32%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
18%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
7%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
8%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
44%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
42%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MSBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSRCF0.05N/A
N/A
GSP RESOURCE CORP.
VLXGF5.25N/A
N/A
Volex Group Plc.
PREKF17.47-0.01
-0.03%
Prairiesky Royalty Ltd.
HKHHY38.22-0.24
-0.62%
Heineken Holding N.V.
MMNGF0.16-0.02
-11.60%
Metallic Minerals Corp.

MSBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MSBC and BKALF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSBC and BKALF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSBC
1D Price
Change %
MSBC100%
N/A
BKALF - MSBC
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBWA - MSBC
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PWBK - MSBC
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLBK - MSBC
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
FINW - MSBC
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
More

MZTFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MZTFF has been loosely correlated with BPCGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MZTFF jumps, then BPCGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MZTFF
1D Price
Change %
MZTFF100%
N/A
BPCGF - MZTFF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MSBC - MZTFF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NASB - MZTFF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
NDBKF - MZTFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NACB - MZTFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More