Advertisement
MSB vs SMSMY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MSB is a Hold and SMSMY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MSB’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSMSMY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MSB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- SMSMY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MSB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- MSB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MSB (@Steel) experienced а -2.61% price change this week, while SMSMY (@Steel) price change was -0.10% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was -0.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.58%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Steel (-0.69% weekly)The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.
| MSB | SMSMY | MSB / SMSMY | |
| Capitalization | 337M | 1.94B | 17% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.123 | 37.968 | 35% |
| P/E Ratio | 3.61 | 1578.01 | 0% |
| Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 13.5M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
MSB | SMSMY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 6 Undervalued | 96 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 53 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 9 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MSB's Valuation (6) in the Steel industry is significantly better than the same rating for SMSMY (96) in the null industry. This means that MSB’s stock grew significantly faster than SMSMY’s over the last 12 months.
MSB's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Steel industry is in the same range as SMSMY (53) in the null industry. This means that MSB’s stock grew similarly to SMSMY’s over the last 12 months.
MSB's SMR Rating (9) in the Steel industry is significantly better than the same rating for SMSMY (93) in the null industry. This means that MSB’s stock grew significantly faster than SMSMY’s over the last 12 months.
MSB's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Steel industry is in the same range as SMSMY (44) in the null industry. This means that MSB’s stock grew similarly to SMSMY’s over the last 12 months.
SMSMY's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MSB (98) in the Steel industry. This means that SMSMY’s stock grew significantly faster than MSB’s over the last 12 months.
| MSB | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 78% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MQT | 9.52 | -0.02 | -0.20% |
| Blackrock Muni Yield Quality Fund II | |||
| IYY | 145.50 | -1.64 | -1.11% |
| iShares Dow Jones US ETF | |||
| INDL | 59.90 | -1.62 | -2.63% |
| Direxion Daily MSCI India Bull 2x ETF | |||
| SMHX | 28.51 | -0.86 | -2.93% |
| VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF | |||
| GDLC | 44.70 | -1.75 | -3.76% |
| Grayscale Digital Large Cap Fund LLC | |||
MSB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MSB and ZEUS have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSB and ZEUS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MSB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSB | 100% | -3.53% | ||
| ZEUS - MSB | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.96% | ||
| CLF - MSB | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.14% | ||
| SID - MSB | 25% Poorly correlated | -3.97% | ||
| PKX - MSB | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.20% | ||
| ASTL - MSB | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.13% | ||
More | ||||
SMSMY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SMSMY and MSB have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMSMY and MSB's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMSMY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMSMY | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| MSB - SMSMY | 26% Poorly correlated | -3.53% | ||
| CMC - SMSMY | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.55% | ||
| CLF - SMSMY | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.14% | ||
| ANIOY - SMSMY | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RDUS - SMSMY | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.14% | ||
More | ||||