MS
Price
$131.69
Change
-$2.65 (-1.97%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
153.98B
47 days until earnings call
VALU
Price
$39.55
Change
+$1.01 (+2.62%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
383.41M
Ad is loading...

MS vs VALU

Header iconMS vs VALU Comparison
Open Charts MS vs VALUBanner chart's image
Morgan Stanley
Price$131.69
Change-$2.65 (-1.97%)
Volume$6.7M
Capitalization153.98B
Value Line
Price$39.55
Change+$1.01 (+2.62%)
Volume$5.96K
Capitalization383.41M
MS vs VALU Comparison Chart
Loading...
MS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VALU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MS vs. VALU commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MS is a StrongBuy and VALU is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (MS: $140.71 vs. VALU: $36.70)
Brand notoriety: MS: Notable vs. VALU: Not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MS: 60% vs. VALU: 206%
Market capitalization -- MS: $153.98B vs. VALU: $383.41M
MS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $153.98B. VALU’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $383.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileVALU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • VALU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MS is a better buy in the long-term than VALU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VALU’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VALU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VALU is a better buy in the short-term than MS.

Price Growth

MS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +2.12% price change this week, while VALU (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +5.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -1.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

MS is expected to report earnings on Apr 11, 2025.

VALU is expected to report earnings on Dec 13, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-1.21% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MS($154B) has a higher market cap than VALU($383M). VALU has higher P/E ratio than MS: VALU (20.97) vs MS (18.06). MS YTD gains are higher at: 5.446 vs. VALU (-24.575). MS has more cash in the bank: 4.29B vs. VALU (67.3M). VALU has less debt than MS: VALU (5.13M) vs MS (276B). MS has higher revenues than VALU: MS (50.7B) vs VALU (38.2M).
MSVALUMS / VALU
Capitalization154B383M40,209%
EBITDAN/A11.8M-
Gain YTD5.446-24.575-22%
P/E Ratio18.0620.9786%
Revenue50.7B38.2M132,723%
Total Cash4.29B67.3M6,379%
Total Debt276B5.13M5,379,068%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MS vs VALU: Fundamental Ratings
MS
VALU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7554
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
782
SMR RATING
1..100
540
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1286
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4789
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VALU's Valuation (24) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for MS (95) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that VALU’s stock grew significantly faster than MS’s over the last 12 months.

MS's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for VALU (82) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that MS’s stock grew significantly faster than VALU’s over the last 12 months.

MS's SMR Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VALU (40) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that MS’s stock grew somewhat faster than VALU’s over the last 12 months.

MS's Price Growth Rating (12) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for VALU (86) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that MS’s stock grew significantly faster than VALU’s over the last 12 months.

MS's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VALU (89) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry. This means that MS’s stock grew somewhat faster than VALU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MSVALU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VALU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL245.55-0.28
-0.11%
Apple
BTC.X96258.000000-319.757800
-0.33%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY599.94-10.44
-1.71%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.42-0.62
-2.29%
GameStop Corp
TSLA337.80-16.60
-4.68%
Tesla

MS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MS has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MS jumps, then GS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MS
1D Price
Change %
MS100%
-1.97%
GS - MS
81%
Closely correlated
-2.59%
SF - MS
73%
Closely correlated
-3.07%
PIPR - MS
71%
Closely correlated
-3.14%
EVR - MS
68%
Closely correlated
-2.67%
JEF - MS
67%
Closely correlated
-1.69%
More

VALU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VALU and PIPR have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VALU and PIPR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VALU
1D Price
Change %
VALU100%
+2.62%
PIPR - VALU
27%
Poorly correlated
-3.14%
EVR - VALU
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.67%
RJF - VALU
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.28%
SF - VALU
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.07%
MS - VALU
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.97%
More