MS
Price
$99.83
Change
-$8.10 (-7.50%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
153.98B
5 days until earnings call
SCHW
Price
$69.03
Change
-$5.84 (-7.80%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
132.03B
15 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MS vs SCHW

Header iconMS vs SCHW Comparison
Open Charts MS vs SCHWBanner chart's image
Morgan Stanley
Price$99.83
Change-$8.10 (-7.50%)
Volume$99.02K
Capitalization153.98B
Charles Schwab Corp (The)
Price$69.03
Change-$5.84 (-7.80%)
Volume$128.77K
Capitalization132.03B
MS vs SCHW Comparison Chart
Loading...
MS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCHW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MS vs. SCHW commentary
Apr 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MS is a Hold and SCHW is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MS: $107.93 vs. SCHW: $74.87)
Brand notoriety: MS and SCHW are both notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MS: 213% vs. SCHW: 111%
Market capitalization -- MS: $153.98B vs. SCHW: $132.03B
MS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $153.98B. SCHW’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $132.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSCHW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SCHW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCHW is a better buy in the long-term than MS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCHW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SCHW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCHW is a better buy in the short-term than MS.

Price Growth

MS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -9.30% price change this week, while SCHW (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -5.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -5.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +138.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

MS is expected to report earnings on Apr 11, 2025.

SCHW is expected to report earnings on Apr 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-5.42% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MS($154B) has a higher market cap than SCHW($132B). SCHW has higher P/E ratio than MS: SCHW (28.49) vs MS (18.06). SCHW YTD gains are higher at: 1.498 vs. MS (-13.579). SCHW has less debt than MS: SCHW (59.1B) vs MS (276B). MS has higher revenues than SCHW: MS (50.7B) vs SCHW (18.8B).
MSSCHWMS / SCHW
Capitalization154B132B117%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-13.5791.498-907%
P/E Ratio18.0628.4963%
Revenue50.7B18.8B270%
Total Cash4.29BN/A-
Total Debt276B59.1B467%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MS vs SCHW: Fundamental Ratings
MS
SCHW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1066
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
934
SMR RATING
1..100
55
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5545
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6957
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCHW's Valuation (82) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MS (100). This means that SCHW’s stock grew similarly to MS’s over the last 12 months.

MS's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SCHW (34). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to SCHW’s over the last 12 months.

MS's SMR Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SCHW (5). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to SCHW’s over the last 12 months.

SCHW's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MS (55). This means that SCHW’s stock grew similarly to MS’s over the last 12 months.

SCHW's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MS (69). This means that SCHW’s stock grew similarly to MS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MSSCHW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCHW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X83102.830000617.109400
+0.75%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY536.70-27.82
-4.93%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA267.28-15.48
-5.47%
Tesla
GME21.10-1.59
-7.01%
GameStop Corp
AAPL203.19-20.70
-9.25%
Apple

MS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MS has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MS jumps, then GS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MS
1D Price
Change %
MS100%
-9.51%
GS - MS
86%
Closely correlated
-9.21%
SF - MS
78%
Closely correlated
-10.87%
EVR - MS
76%
Closely correlated
-15.48%
PIPR - MS
75%
Closely correlated
-11.17%
MC - MS
73%
Closely correlated
-11.96%
More

SCHW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHW has been loosely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHW jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCHW
1D Price
Change %
SCHW100%
-4.73%
RJF - SCHW
65%
Loosely correlated
-8.18%
SF - SCHW
55%
Loosely correlated
-10.87%
LPLA - SCHW
52%
Loosely correlated
-7.58%
MS - SCHW
51%
Loosely correlated
-9.51%
GS - SCHW
48%
Loosely correlated
-9.21%
More