MS
Price
$132.76
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
63 days until earnings call
SCHW
Price
$78.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
62 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MS vs SCHW

Header iconMS vs SCHW Comparison
Open Charts MS vs SCHWBanner chart's image
Morgan Stanley
Price$132.76
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6.13M
CapitalizationN/A
Charles Schwab Corp (The)
Price$78.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$8.73M
CapitalizationN/A
MS vs SCHW Comparison Chart
Loading...
MS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SCHW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MS vs. SCHW commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MS is a StrongBuy and SCHW is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (MS: $132.76 vs. SCHW: $78.25)
Brand notoriety: MS and SCHW are both notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MS: 95% vs. SCHW: 106%
Market capitalization -- MS: $153.98B vs. SCHW: $132.03B
MS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $153.98B. SCHW’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $132.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.4B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MS’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileSCHW’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MS’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • SCHW’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MS and SCHW are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCHW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SCHW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCHW is a better buy in the short-term than MS.

Price Growth

MS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +0.97% price change this week, while SCHW (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +3.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +4.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +21.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

MS is expected to report earnings on Jan 16, 2025.

SCHW is expected to report earnings on Jan 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+4.80% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MS($154B) has a higher market cap than SCHW($132B). SCHW has higher P/E ratio than MS: SCHW (28.49) vs MS (18.06). MS YTD gains are higher at: 47.556 vs. SCHW (15.420). SCHW has less debt than MS: SCHW (59.1B) vs MS (276B). MS has higher revenues than SCHW: MS (50.7B) vs SCHW (18.8B).
MSSCHWMS / SCHW
Capitalization154B132B117%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD47.55615.420308%
P/E Ratio18.0628.4963%
Revenue50.7B18.8B270%
Total Cash4.29BN/A-
Total Debt276B59.1B467%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MS vs SCHW: Fundamental Ratings
MS
SCHW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7724
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
738
SMR RATING
1..100
55
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
417
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2718
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCHW's Valuation (86) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MS (96). This means that SCHW’s stock grew similarly to MS’s over the last 12 months.

MS's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SCHW (38). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to SCHW’s over the last 12 months.

MS's SMR Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SCHW (5). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to SCHW’s over the last 12 months.

MS's Price Growth Rating (4) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SCHW (17). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to SCHW’s over the last 12 months.

SCHW's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MS (27). This means that SCHW’s stock grew similarly to MS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MSSCHW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SCHW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X90584.1640002628.351600
+2.99%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA330.241.75
+0.53%
Tesla
AAPL225.120.89
+0.40%
Apple
SPY597.190.29
+0.05%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.46-0.38
-1.42%
GameStop Corp

MS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MS has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MS jumps, then GS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MS
1D Price
Change %
MS100%
+0.34%
GS - MS
80%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
SF - MS
70%
Closely correlated
-1.00%
JEF - MS
69%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
PIPR - MS
68%
Closely correlated
-0.94%
MC - MS
66%
Loosely correlated
-2.04%
More

SCHW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHW has been loosely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHW jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCHW
1D Price
Change %
SCHW100%
+0.08%
RJF - SCHW
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.00%
SF - SCHW
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.00%
MS - SCHW
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
GS - SCHW
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
JEF - SCHW
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
More