MS
Price
$179.03
Change
-$3.87 (-2.12%)
Updated
Feb 4, 03:03 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
289.55B
70 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OPY
Price
$89.34
Change
+$2.75 (+3.18%)
Updated
Feb 4, 03:03 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
916.72M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MS vs OPY

Header iconMS vs OPY Comparison
Open Charts MS vs OPYBanner chart's image
Morgan Stanley
Price$179.03
Change-$3.87 (-2.12%)
Volume$3.33K
Capitalization289.55B
Oppenheimer Holdings
Price$89.34
Change+$2.75 (+3.18%)
Volume$1.89K
Capitalization916.72M
MS vs OPY Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MS vs. OPY commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MS is a Buy and OPY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (MS: $182.91 vs. OPY: $86.59)
Brand notoriety: MS: Notable vs. OPY: Not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MS: 127% vs. OPY: 291%
Market capitalization -- MS: $289.55B vs. OPY: $916.72M
MS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $289.55B. OPY’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $916.72M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileOPY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • OPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MS is a better buy in the long-term than OPY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OPY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OPY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OPY is a better buy in the short-term than MS.

Price Growth

MS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +0.69% price change this week, while OPY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +14.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -6.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

MS is expected to report earnings on Apr 15, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-6.92% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MS($290B) has a higher market cap than OPY($917M). MS has higher P/E ratio than OPY: MS (17.91) vs OPY (6.64). OPY YTD gains are higher at: 19.781 vs. MS (3.598). MS has more cash in the bank: 4.29B vs. OPY (28.8M). OPY has less debt than MS: OPY (722M) vs MS (353B). MS has higher revenues than OPY: MS (64.2B) vs OPY (1.54B).
MSOPYMS / OPY
Capitalization290B917M31,625%
EBITDAN/A248M-
Gain YTD3.59819.78118%
P/E Ratio17.916.64270%
Revenue64.2B1.54B4,166%
Total Cash4.29B28.8M14,906%
Total Debt353B722M48,892%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MS vs OPY: Fundamental Ratings
MS
OPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7280
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1217
SMR RATING
1..100
672
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1640
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4788
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6565

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OPY's Valuation (25) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MS (84). This means that OPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MS’s over the last 12 months.

MS's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as OPY (17). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to OPY’s over the last 12 months.

MS's SMR Rating (6) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for OPY (72). This means that MS’s stock grew significantly faster than OPY’s over the last 12 months.

MS's Price Growth Rating (16) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as OPY (40). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to OPY’s over the last 12 months.

MS's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OPY (88). This means that MS’s stock grew somewhat faster than OPY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MSOPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OPY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCHD30.500.50
+1.67%
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF™
LST42.310.22
+0.52%
Leuthold Select Industries ETF
FLUD25.010.01
+0.04%
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF
SIFI43.93N/A
N/A
Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF
CSHI49.69-0.02
-0.04%
NEOS Enhanced Inc 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF

MS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MS has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MS jumps, then GS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MS
1D Price
Change %
MS100%
-1.18%
GS - MS
92%
Closely correlated
-0.78%
SF - MS
86%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
EVR - MS
84%
Closely correlated
-4.50%
RJF - MS
82%
Closely correlated
-0.68%
PIPR - MS
80%
Closely correlated
-3.13%
More

OPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OPY has been closely correlated with PIPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OPY jumps, then PIPR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OPY
1D Price
Change %
OPY100%
-2.78%
PIPR - OPY
67%
Closely correlated
-3.13%
MS - OPY
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.18%
MC - OPY
65%
Loosely correlated
-3.17%
JEF - OPY
64%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GS - OPY
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
More