MS
Price
$181.87
Change
+$0.22 (+0.12%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
289.05B
18 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NMR
Price
$8.41
Change
+$0.09 (+1.08%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
24.65B
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MS vs NMR

Header iconMS vs NMR Comparison
Open Charts MS vs NMRBanner chart's image
Morgan Stanley
Price$181.87
Change+$0.22 (+0.12%)
Volume$2.56M
Capitalization289.05B
Nomura Holdings
Price$8.41
Change+$0.09 (+1.08%)
Volume$506.16K
Capitalization24.65B
MS vs NMR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MS vs. NMR commentary
Dec 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MS is a Buy and NMR is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 29, 2025
Stock price -- (MS: $181.87 vs. NMR: $8.41)
Brand notoriety: MS: Notable vs. NMR: Not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MS: 47% vs. NMR: 58%
Market capitalization -- MS: $289.05B vs. NMR: $24.65B
MS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $289.05B. NMR’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $24.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNMR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NMR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NMR is a better buy in the long-term than MS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NMR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NMR is a better buy in the short-term than MS.

Price Growth

MS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +2.76% price change this week, while NMR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +2.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

MS is expected to report earnings on Jan 15, 2026.

NMR is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.40% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MS($289B) has a higher market cap than NMR($24.6B). MS has higher P/E ratio than NMR: MS (18.65) vs NMR (10.86). MS YTD gains are higher at: 48.713 vs. NMR (45.250). MS has less debt than NMR: MS (353B) vs NMR (16.16T). NMR has higher revenues than MS: NMR (1.76T) vs MS (64.2B).
MSNMRMS / NMR
Capitalization289B24.6B1,175%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD48.71345.250108%
P/E Ratio18.6510.86172%
Revenue64.2B1.76T4%
Total Cash4.29BN/A-
Total Debt353B16.16T2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MS vs NMR: Fundamental Ratings
MS
NMR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9238
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
943
SMR RATING
1..100
61
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1242
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5444
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NMR's Valuation (16) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MS (72). This means that NMR’s stock grew somewhat faster than MS’s over the last 12 months.

MS's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NMR (43). This means that MS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NMR’s over the last 12 months.

NMR's SMR Rating (1) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MS (6). This means that NMR’s stock grew similarly to MS’s over the last 12 months.

MS's Price Growth Rating (12) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NMR (42). This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to NMR’s over the last 12 months.

NMR's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MS (54). This means that NMR’s stock grew similarly to MS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MSNMR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NMR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EWQ45.180.20
+0.44%
iShares MSCI France ETF
SPYX56.910.03
+0.05%
SttStrt® SPDR® S&P®500FsslFulRsrvFreeETF
PSMJ32.26N/A
N/A
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF
AVIE65.90N/A
N/A
Avantis Inflation Focused Equity ETF
CVNX28.22-0.48
-1.68%
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long CVNA ETF

MS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MS has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MS jumps, then GS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MS
1D Price
Change %
MS100%
+0.12%
GS - MS
91%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
SF - MS
84%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
EVR - MS
84%
Closely correlated
+0.50%
RJF - MS
82%
Closely correlated
-0.30%
JEF - MS
80%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
More

NMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMR has been loosely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NMR jumps, then GS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMR
1D Price
Change %
NMR100%
+1.08%
GS - NMR
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
SF - NMR
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
DSEEY - NMR
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
EVR - NMR
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
MS - NMR
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
More