MS
Price
$143.01
Change
+$0.51 (+0.36%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
153.98B
80 days until earnings call
NCPL
Price
$3.19
Change
-$0.08 (-2.45%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.8M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MS vs NCPL

Header iconMS vs NCPL Comparison
Open Charts MS vs NCPLBanner chart's image
Morgan Stanley
Price$143.01
Change+$0.51 (+0.36%)
Volume$3.46M
Capitalization153.98B
NETCAPITAL
Price$3.19
Change-$0.08 (-2.45%)
Volume$139.74K
Capitalization2.8M
MS vs NCPL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NCPL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MS vs. NCPL commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MS is a StrongBuy and NCPL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (MS: $143.01 vs. NCPL: $3.19)
Brand notoriety: MS: Notable vs. NCPL: Not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MS: 66% vs. NCPL: 21%
Market capitalization -- MS: $153.98B vs. NCPL: $2.8M
MS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $153.98B. NCPL’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $2.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNCPL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NCPL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MS is a better buy in the long-term than NCPL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NCPL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NCPL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MS is a better buy in the short-term than NCPL.

Price Growth

MS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +1.55% price change this week, while NCPL (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -1.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -2.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

MS is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-2.06% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MS($154B) has a higher market cap than NCPL($2.8M). MS has higher P/E ratio than NCPL: MS (18.06) vs NCPL (0.25). NCPL YTD gains are higher at: 53.365 vs. MS (15.428). MS has more cash in the bank: 4.29B vs. NCPL (2.17M). NCPL has less debt than MS: NCPL (2.44M) vs MS (276B). MS has higher revenues than NCPL: MS (50.7B) vs NCPL (7.72M).
MSNCPLMS / NCPL
Capitalization154B2.8M5,496,074%
EBITDAN/A-3.19M-
Gain YTD15.42853.36529%
P/E Ratio18.060.257,337%
Revenue50.7B7.72M656,906%
Total Cash4.29B2.17M197,652%
Total Debt276B2.44M11,334,702%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MS vs NCPL: Fundamental Ratings
MS
NCPL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7356
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
13100
SMR RATING
1..100
595
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1845
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
61100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MS's Valuation (42) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NCPL (74) in the null industry. This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to NCPL’s over the last 12 months.

MS's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for NCPL (100) in the null industry. This means that MS’s stock grew significantly faster than NCPL’s over the last 12 months.

MS's SMR Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for NCPL (95) in the null industry. This means that MS’s stock grew significantly faster than NCPL’s over the last 12 months.

MS's Price Growth Rating (18) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NCPL (45) in the null industry. This means that MS’s stock grew similarly to NCPL’s over the last 12 months.

MS's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCPL (100) in the null industry. This means that MS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCPL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MSNCPL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NCPL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
COTY5.120.17
+3.43%
COTY
UBCP14.400.34
+2.45%
United Bancorp
PRTC19.070.07
+0.36%
PureTech Health plc
SID1.53-0.04
-2.55%
Companhia Siderurgica Nacional SA
TNON1.06-0.03
-2.75%
Tenon Medical Inc

MS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MS has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MS jumps, then GS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MS
1D Price
Change %
MS100%
+0.36%
GS - MS
92%
Closely correlated
+1.36%
EVR - MS
86%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
SF - MS
86%
Closely correlated
+1.50%
JEF - MS
84%
Closely correlated
+1.10%
PIPR - MS
83%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
More

NCPL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NCPL and NMR have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NCPL and NMR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NCPL
1D Price
Change %
NCPL100%
-2.45%
NMR - NCPL
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
SF - NCPL
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.50%
LAZ - NCPL
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
MS - NCPL
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
MORN - NCPL
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
More