MRVSY
Price
$4.70
Change
-$0.05 (-1.05%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.2B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
SLCJY
Price
$3.11
Change
-$0.01 (-0.32%)
Updated
Sep 29 closing price
Capitalization
1.37B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MRVSY vs SLCJY

Header iconMRVSY vs SLCJY Comparison
Open Charts MRVSY vs SLCJYBanner chart's image
Minerva S.A
Price$4.70
Change-$0.05 (-1.05%)
Volume$6.5K
Capitalization1.2B
SLC Agricola Sa
Price$3.11
Change-$0.01 (-0.32%)
Volume$782
Capitalization1.37B
MRVSY vs SLCJY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MRVSY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLCJY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MRVSY vs. SLCJY commentary
Sep 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRVSY is a Hold and SLCJY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 30, 2025
Stock price -- (MRVSY: $4.70 vs. SLCJY: $3.11)
Brand notoriety: MRVSY and SLCJY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MRVSY: 146% vs. SLCJY: 6%
Market capitalization -- MRVSY: $1.2B vs. SLCJY: $1.37B
MRVSY [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] is valued at $1.2B. SLCJY’s [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] market capitalization is $1.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry ranges from $34.75B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry is $2.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MRVSY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLCJY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MRVSY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SLCJY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLCJY is a better buy in the long-term than MRVSY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MRVSY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLCJY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MRVSY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SLCJY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MRVSY is a better buy in the short-term than SLCJY.

Price Growth

MRVSY (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) experienced а -1.05% price change this week, while SLCJY (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) price change was +1.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was +0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.87%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (+0.17% weekly)

The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLCJY($1.37B) has a higher market cap than MRVSY($1.2B). MRVSY has higher P/E ratio than SLCJY: MRVSY (2580.41) vs SLCJY (12.49). MRVSY YTD gains are higher at: 38.965 vs. SLCJY (18.334). MRVSY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.25B vs. SLCJY (2.37B). MRVSY has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. SLCJY (1.15B). SLCJY has less debt than MRVSY: SLCJY (10.1B) vs MRVSY (26.8B). MRVSY has higher revenues than SLCJY: MRVSY (44.3B) vs SLCJY (8.79B).
MRVSYSLCJYMRVSY / SLCJY
Capitalization1.2B1.37B88%
EBITDA3.25B2.37B137%
Gain YTD38.96518.334213%
P/E Ratio2580.4112.4920,665%
Revenue44.3B8.79B504%
Total Cash12.5B1.15B1,087%
Total Debt26.8B10.1B265%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MRVSY vs SLCJY: Fundamental Ratings
MRVSY
SLCJY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
263
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10053
SMR RATING
1..100
9864
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5660
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
163
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLCJY's Valuation (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MRVSY (93). This means that SLCJY’s stock grew significantly faster than MRVSY’s over the last 12 months.

SLCJY's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MRVSY (100). This means that SLCJY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MRVSY’s over the last 12 months.

SLCJY's SMR Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MRVSY (98). This means that SLCJY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MRVSY’s over the last 12 months.

MRVSY's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as SLCJY (60). This means that MRVSY’s stock grew similarly to SLCJY’s over the last 12 months.

MRVSY's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLCJY (63). This means that MRVSY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLCJY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MRVSYSLCJY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MRVSY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLCJY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JFRDX59.930.39
+0.66%
Janus Henderson Forty D
TDEIX34.820.13
+0.37%
Transamerica US Growth I
AVEAX17.990.03
+0.17%
Ave Maria Growth Focused
FVIFX37.16N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Value I
PIIFX33.02-0.01
-0.03%
Victory Pioneer International Equ A

MRVSY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MRVSY and SLCJY have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MRVSY and SLCJY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRVSY
1D Price
Change %
MRVSY100%
N/A
SLCJY - MRVSY
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
CHPFF - MRVSY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DOLE - MRVSY
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
CHYI - MRVSY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AEPLF - MRVSY
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SLCJY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLCJY and MRVSY have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLCJY and MRVSY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLCJY
1D Price
Change %
SLCJY100%
-0.30%
MRVSY - SLCJY
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AGRI - SLCJY
8%
Poorly correlated
-8.52%
CHPFF - SLCJY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DOLE - SLCJY
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
CHYI - SLCJY
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More