Advertisement
MRTI vs NWHUF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRTI is a Hold and NWHUF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MRTI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNWHUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MRTI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NWHUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MRTI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NWHUF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MRTI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NWHUF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
MRTI (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а +3.13% price change this week, while NWHUF (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was +1.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.12%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was +1.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.15%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Media Conglomerates (+1.30% weekly)Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.
@Publishing: Books/Magazines (+1.62% weekly)The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.
| MRTI | NWHUF | MRTI / NWHUF | |
| Capitalization | 98M | 1.04B | 9% |
| EBITDA | 33.8M | 218M | 16% |
| Gain YTD | -17.500 | 12.366 | -142% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 28.28 | - |
| Revenue | 71.7M | 418M | 17% |
| Total Cash | 6.69M | 77.4M | 9% |
| Total Debt | 356M | 2.91B | 12% |
MRTI | NWHUF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 52 Fair valued | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 87 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 45 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 20 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NWHUF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MRTI (52). This means that NWHUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MRTI’s over the last 12 months.
MRTI's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NWHUF (100). This means that MRTI’s stock grew somewhat faster than NWHUF’s over the last 12 months.
NWHUF's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as MRTI (91). This means that NWHUF’s stock grew similarly to MRTI’s over the last 12 months.
NWHUF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as MRTI (47). This means that NWHUF’s stock grew similarly to MRTI’s over the last 12 months.
MRTI's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NWHUF (45). This means that MRTI’s stock grew somewhat faster than NWHUF’s over the last 12 months.
| MRTI | NWHUF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 53% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 75% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 35% |
Advertisement
MRTI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MRTI and MEIYF have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MRTI and MEIYF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MRTI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRTI | 100% | N/A | ||
| MEIYF - MRTI | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NWHUF - MRTI | -1% Poorly correlated | +0.07% | ||
| MNARF - MRTI | -2% Poorly correlated | -0.64% | ||
| NPONF - MRTI | -3% Poorly correlated | N/A |
NWHUF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NWHUF has been loosely correlated with SRRTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NWHUF jumps, then SRRTF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NWHUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NWHUF | 100% | +0.07% | ||
| SRRTF - NWHUF | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| RIOCF - NWHUF | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.53% | ||
| IIPR - NWHUF | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| ELME - NWHUF | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| EPR - NWHUF | 44% Loosely correlated | +3.21% | ||
More | ||||