MRT vs PLGGF
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MRT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePLGGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- MRT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PLGGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MRT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- MRT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
MRT (@Packaged Software) experienced а -10.46% price change this week, while PLGGF (@Packaged Software) price change was +12.90% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.36%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-2.38% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| MRT | PLGGF | MRT / PLGGF | |
| Capitalization | 39.8M | N/A | - |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.159 | -39.130 | 36% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 3.97M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 28.4M | N/A | - |
MRT | PLGGF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 84 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 6 Undervalued | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 40 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MRT's Valuation (6) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLGGF (71) in the null industry. This means that MRT’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLGGF’s over the last 12 months.
MRT's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as PLGGF (100) in the null industry. This means that MRT’s stock grew similarly to PLGGF’s over the last 12 months.
MRT's SMR Rating (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as PLGGF (100) in the null industry. This means that MRT’s stock grew similarly to PLGGF’s over the last 12 months.
MRT's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as PLGGF (44) in the null industry. This means that MRT’s stock grew similarly to PLGGF’s over the last 12 months.
MRT's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as PLGGF (100) in the null industry. This means that MRT’s stock grew similarly to PLGGF’s over the last 12 months.
| MRT | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 47% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 33% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 42% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 76% |
MRT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MRT and PLGGF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MRT and PLGGF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MRT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRT | 100% | -5.98% | ||
| PLGGF - MRT | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.25% | ||
| HCAT - MRT | 28% Poorly correlated | -6.97% | ||
| AUUD - MRT | 24% Poorly correlated | -7.18% | ||
| MSGM - MRT | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.94% | ||
| GRRR - MRT | 24% Poorly correlated | -8.57% | ||
More | ||||
PLGGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PLGGF and MRT have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLGGF and MRT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLGGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLGGF | 100% | -1.25% | ||
| MRT - PLGGF | 33% Poorly correlated | -5.98% | ||
| HCAT - PLGGF | 31% Poorly correlated | -6.97% | ||
| ASFT - PLGGF | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| APPS - PLGGF | 29% Poorly correlated | -12.67% | ||
| KVYO - PLGGF | 27% Poorly correlated | -11.13% | ||
More | ||||