MRM
Price
$2.94
Change
+$1.49 (+102.76%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
23.23M
TNGCF
Price
$2.30
Change
+$0.02 (+0.88%)
Updated
Jan 16 closing price
Capitalization
6.76B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MRM vs TNGCF

Header iconMRM vs TNGCF Comparison
Open Charts MRM vs TNGCFBanner chart's image
MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies
Price$2.94
Change+$1.49 (+102.76%)
Volume$65.09M
Capitalization23.23M
TONGCHENG TRAVEL
Price$2.30
Change+$0.02 (+0.88%)
Volume$118K
Capitalization6.76B
MRM vs TNGCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MRM vs. TNGCF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRM is a Buy and TNGCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (MRM: $2.94 vs. TNGCF: $2.30)
Brand notoriety: MRM and TNGCF are both not notable
MRM represents the Personnel Services, while TNGCF is part of the Consumer Sundries industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MRM: 1147% vs. TNGCF: 100%
Market capitalization -- MRM: $23.23M vs. TNGCF: $6.76B
MRM [@Personnel Services] is valued at $23.23M. TNGCF’s [@Consumer Sundries] market capitalization is $6.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $28.32B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $179.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $2.81B. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $18.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MRM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTNGCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TNGCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MRM is a better buy in the long-term than TNGCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MRM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MRM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

MRM (@Personnel Services) experienced а +67.05% price change this week, while TNGCF (@Consumer Sundries) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was +2.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.57%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was -0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +41.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.14%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Personnel Services (+2.78% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

@Consumer Sundries (-0.31% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TNGCF($6.76B) has a higher market cap than MRM($23.2M). TNGCF has higher P/E ratio than MRM: TNGCF (19.50) vs MRM (15.33). MRM YTD gains are higher at: 185.437 vs. TNGCF (0.701).
MRMTNGCFMRM / TNGCF
Capitalization23.2M6.76B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD185.4370.70126,471%
P/E Ratio15.3319.5079%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MRMTNGCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
3%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
3%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
72%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPXL207.993.43
+1.68%
Direxion Daily S&P500® Bull 3X ETF
JMID30.150.36
+1.20%
Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
KRMA42.880.33
+0.76%
Global X Conscious Companies ETF
GRN30.46N/A
N/A
iPath® Series B Carbon ETN
BNDC22.45-0.01
-0.06%
FlexShares Core Select Bond ETF

MRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MRM and ROL have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MRM and ROL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRM
1D Price
Change %
MRM100%
+102.76%
ROL - MRM
10%
Poorly correlated
+3.53%
IVP - MRM
9%
Poorly correlated
-6.53%
SCI - MRM
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.58%
HRB - MRM
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
TRPCF - MRM
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TNGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TNGCF and SDRMF have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TNGCF and SDRMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TNGCF
1D Price
Change %
TNGCF100%
N/A
SDRMF - TNGCF
1%
Poorly correlated
+8.67%
TRPCF - TNGCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRM - TNGCF
0%
Poorly correlated
+102.76%
PLWN - TNGCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EJH - TNGCF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
More