MRM
Price
$2.94
Change
+$1.49 (+102.76%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
23.23M
SCI
Price
$82.11
Change
+$1.28 (+1.58%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
11.52B
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MRM vs SCI

Header iconMRM vs SCI Comparison
Open Charts MRM vs SCIBanner chart's image
MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies
Price$2.94
Change+$1.49 (+102.76%)
Volume$65.09M
Capitalization23.23M
Service
Price$82.11
Change+$1.28 (+1.58%)
Volume$685.08K
Capitalization11.52B
MRM vs SCI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MRM vs. SCI commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRM is a Buy and SCI is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (MRM: $2.94 vs. SCI: $82.11)
Brand notoriety: MRM and SCI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Personnel Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MRM: 1147% vs. SCI: 66%
Market capitalization -- MRM: $23.23M vs. SCI: $11.52B
MRM [@Personnel Services] is valued at $23.23M. SCI’s [@Personnel Services] market capitalization is $11.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $28.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $2.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MRM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSCI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SCI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCI is a better buy in the long-term than MRM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MRM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCI’s TA Score has 8 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MRM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SCI’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCI is a better buy in the short-term than MRM.

Price Growth

MRM (@Personnel Services) experienced а +67.05% price change this week, while SCI (@Personnel Services) price change was +2.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was +2.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

SCI is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Personnel Services (+2.78% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCI($11.5B) has a higher market cap than MRM($23.2M). SCI has higher P/E ratio than MRM: SCI (22.31) vs MRM (15.33). MRM YTD gains are higher at: 185.437 vs. SCI (4.119).
MRMSCIMRM / SCI
Capitalization23.2M11.5B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD185.4374.1194,502%
P/E Ratio15.3322.3169%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/A142M-
Total DebtN/A5.04B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SCI: Fundamental Ratings
SCI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
61
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
21
SMR RATING
1..100
28
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MRMSCI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KOCT32.920.30
+0.92%
Innovator US Small Cap Pwr Buff ETF™ Oct
BNGE40.360.32
+0.81%
First Trust S-Network Strmng & Gmng ETF
BCI21.530.05
+0.23%
abrdn Blmb AllCmdStrK1Fr ETF
WEEL19.980.04
+0.21%
Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF
GVAL29.190.06
+0.21%
Cambria Global Value ETF

MRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MRM and ROL have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MRM and ROL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRM
1D Price
Change %
MRM100%
+102.76%
ROL - MRM
10%
Poorly correlated
+3.53%
IVP - MRM
9%
Poorly correlated
-6.53%
TRPCF - MRM
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HRB - MRM
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
SCI - MRM
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.58%
More

SCI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCI has been closely correlated with CSV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCI jumps, then CSV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCI
1D Price
Change %
SCI100%
+1.58%
CSV - SCI
70%
Closely correlated
+1.37%
ROL - SCI
48%
Loosely correlated
+3.53%
SABR - SCI
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
MCW - SCI
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
HRB - SCI
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
More