MRETF
Price
$6.06
Change
+$0.01 (+0.17%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
439.65M
NPSGY
Price
$2.15
Change
+$0.15 (+7.50%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
356.81M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MRETF vs NPSGY

Header iconMRETF vs NPSGY Comparison
Open Charts MRETF vs NPSGYBanner chart's image
Martinrea International
Price$6.06
Change+$0.01 (+0.17%)
Volume$3.31K
Capitalization439.65M
Nippon Sheet Glass
Price$2.15
Change+$0.15 (+7.50%)
Volume$101
Capitalization356.81M
MRETF vs NPSGY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MRETF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MRETF vs. NPSGY commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRETF is a Hold and NPSGY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (MRETF: $6.06 vs. NPSGY: $2.15)
Brand notoriety: MRETF and NPSGY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MRETF: 57% vs. NPSGY: 100%
Market capitalization -- MRETF: $439.65M vs. NPSGY: $356.81M
MRETF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $439.65M. NPSGY’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $356.81M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $87.9B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MRETF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNPSGY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MRETF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NPSGY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MRETF is a better buy in the long-term than NPSGY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MRETF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MRETF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.

Price Growth

MRETF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +0.50% price change this week, while NPSGY (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +4.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.76%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+4.07% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MRETF($440M) has a higher market cap than NPSGY($357M). NPSGY has higher P/E ratio than MRETF: NPSGY (9.07) vs MRETF (5.92). NPSGY YTD gains are higher at: 7.500 vs. MRETF (-3.349). NPSGY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 82.2B vs. MRETF (435M). NPSGY has more cash in the bank: 49.9B vs. MRETF (149M). MRETF has less debt than NPSGY: MRETF (1.26B) vs NPSGY (526B). NPSGY has higher revenues than MRETF: NPSGY (835B) vs MRETF (4.86B).
MRETFNPSGYMRETF / NPSGY
Capitalization440M357M123%
EBITDA435M82.2B1%
Gain YTD-3.3497.500-45%
P/E Ratio5.929.0765%
Revenue4.86B835B1%
Total Cash149M49.9B0%
Total Debt1.26B526B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MRETF vs NPSGY: Fundamental Ratings
MRETF
NPSGY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
92100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6058
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
527
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5021

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MRETF's Valuation (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NPSGY (94). This means that MRETF’s stock grew significantly faster than NPSGY’s over the last 12 months.

MRETF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NPSGY (100). This means that MRETF’s stock grew similarly to NPSGY’s over the last 12 months.

MRETF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as NPSGY (100). This means that MRETF’s stock grew similarly to NPSGY’s over the last 12 months.

NPSGY's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as MRETF (60). This means that NPSGY’s stock grew similarly to MRETF’s over the last 12 months.

NPSGY's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MRETF (52). This means that NPSGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MRETF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MRETFNPSGY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
16%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
18%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
58%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
75%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MRETF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GVIYX12.260.06
+0.49%
GuideStone Funds Value Equity Idx Instl
AMTYX9.880.03
+0.30%
AB All Market Real Return Advisor
DIFHX12.33-0.02
-0.16%
MFS Diversified Income R6
YOVAX16.89-0.04
-0.24%
Yorktown Small-Cap A
BMGKX43.46-0.56
-1.27%
BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity K

MRETF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MRETF and VLEEY have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MRETF and VLEEY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRETF
1D Price
Change %
MRETF100%
+0.23%
VLEEY - MRETF
30%
Poorly correlated
+5.01%
LIMAF - MRETF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
FURCF - MRETF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KNRRY - MRETF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
MGDDY - MRETF
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
More

NPSGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NPSGY and FRSX have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NPSGY and FRSX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NPSGY
1D Price
Change %
NPSGY100%
N/A
FRSX - NPSGY
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
NPSKY - NPSGY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NGKSF - NPSGY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NGKSY - NPSGY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRETF - NPSGY
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
More