Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MRCEX vs RGAHX
MRCEX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MRCEX vs. RGAHX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRCEX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. MRCEX (35.3M). MRCEX pays higher dividends than RGAHX: MRCEX (0.48) vs RGAHX (0.43). MRCEX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: MRCEX (11 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). MRCEX (2.73) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). MRCEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MRCEX: RGAHX (250) vs MRCEX (2500). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.79 vs. MRCEX (-1.81). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.96 vs. MRCEX (-24.83).
| MRCEX | RGAHX | MRCEX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.27 | 0.44 | 516% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.73 | 0.44 | 620% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.588 | -1.010 | -58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 35.3M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.43 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.81 | 2.79 | -65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.41 | 45.40 | 12% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.83 | 13.96 | -178% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.40 | 119.50 | 18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement