MRCC
Price
$7.00
Change
+$0.01 (+0.14%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
151.66M
38 days until earnings call
SFES
Price
$0.90
Change
+$0.04 (+4.65%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
14.99M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MRCC vs SFES

Header iconMRCC vs SFES Comparison
Open Charts MRCC vs SFESBanner chart's image
Monroe Capital
Price$7.00
Change+$0.01 (+0.14%)
Volume$65.38K
Capitalization151.66M
Safeguard Scientifics
Price$0.90
Change+$0.04 (+4.65%)
Volume$1.12K
Capitalization14.99M
MRCC vs SFES Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MRCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFES
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MRCC vs. SFES commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRCC is a Buy and SFES is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (MRCC: $7.00 vs. SFES: $0.90)
Brand notoriety: MRCC and SFES are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MRCC: 58% vs. SFES: 6%
Market capitalization -- MRCC: $151.66M vs. SFES: $14.99M
MRCC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $151.66M. SFES’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $14.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $179.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MRCC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSFES’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MRCC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SFES’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MRCC is a better buy in the long-term than SFES.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MRCC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFES’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MRCC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SFES’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MRCC is a better buy in the short-term than SFES.

Price Growth

MRCC (@Investment Managers) experienced а -5.91% price change this week, while SFES (@Investment Managers) price change was +4.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +39.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

MRCC is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-1.95% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MRCC($152M) has a higher market cap than SFES($15M). SFES YTD gains are higher at: 3.973 vs. MRCC (-8.745). SFES has less debt than MRCC: SFES (1.25M) vs MRCC (209M).
MRCCSFESMRCC / SFES
Capitalization152M15M1,013%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-8.7453.973-220%
P/E Ratio77.78N/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash5.32MN/A-
Total Debt209M1.25M16,733%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MRCC vs SFES: Fundamental Ratings
MRCC
SFES
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8450
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
34100
SMR RATING
1..100
87100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5552
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MRCC's Valuation (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFES (65). This means that MRCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFES’s over the last 12 months.

MRCC's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SFES (100). This means that MRCC’s stock grew significantly faster than SFES’s over the last 12 months.

MRCC's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as SFES (100). This means that MRCC’s stock grew similarly to SFES’s over the last 12 months.

SFES's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as MRCC (55). This means that SFES’s stock grew similarly to MRCC’s over the last 12 months.

MRCC's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SFES (100). This means that MRCC’s stock grew significantly faster than SFES’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MRCCSFES
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MRCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFES
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
POAHY3.830.02
+0.39%
Porsche Automobile Holding SE
PRZFF0.09N/A
N/A
Boundary Gold & Copper Mng Ltd.
SCFR0.15N/A
N/A
Security First International Holdings, Inc.
EMHLF0.12N/A
N/A
European Metals Holdings Ltd.
NPSKY10.48-0.27
-2.51%
NSK Ltd.

MRCC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRCC has been loosely correlated with BCSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRCC jumps, then BCSF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRCC
1D Price
Change %
MRCC100%
+0.14%
BCSF - MRCC
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
MAIN - MRCC
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
FDUS - MRCC
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.42%
CION - MRCC
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
TSLX - MRCC
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
More

SFES and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SFES and MRCC have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SFES and MRCC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFES
1D Price
Change %
SFES100%
+3.90%
MRCC - SFES
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
HFAHF - SFES
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AHFCF - SFES
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSIF - SFES
16%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
CWD - SFES
12%
Poorly correlated
-6.18%
More