It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MRC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXPRO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MRC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XPRO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
MRC (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -6.02% price change this week, while XPRO (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -6.08% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +5.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.78%.
MRC is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.
XPRO is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.
MRC | XPRO | MRC / XPRO | |
Capitalization | 1.06B | 2.16B | 49% |
EBITDA | 225M | 197M | 114% |
Gain YTD | 23.252 | -15.515 | -150% |
P/E Ratio | 11.91 | 961.50 | 1% |
Revenue | 3.41B | 1.51B | 226% |
Total Cash | 131M | 152M | 86% |
Total Debt | 521M | 111M | 469% |
MRC | XPRO | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 2 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 46 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 47 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 88 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MRC's Valuation (68) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as XPRO (93) in the null industry. This means that MRC’s stock grew similarly to XPRO’s over the last 12 months.
XPRO's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as MRC (77) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that XPRO’s stock grew similarly to MRC’s over the last 12 months.
MRC's SMR Rating (47) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XPRO (88) in the null industry. This means that MRC’s stock grew somewhat faster than XPRO’s over the last 12 months.
MRC's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XPRO (88) in the null industry. This means that MRC’s stock grew somewhat faster than XPRO’s over the last 12 months.
MRC's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for XPRO (100) in the null industry. This means that MRC’s stock grew significantly faster than XPRO’s over the last 12 months.
MRC | XPRO | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago73% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago83% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago82% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago88% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago80% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago83% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago0% | 8 days ago0% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago73% | 2 days ago76% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago83% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago86% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRC has been loosely correlated with NR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRC jumps, then NR could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MRC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MRC | 100% | +0.15% | ||
NR - MRC | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.02% | ||
OII - MRC | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.66% | ||
VTOL - MRC | 49% Loosely correlated | -2.62% | ||
PUMP - MRC | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.12% | ||
XPRO - MRC | 45% Loosely correlated | -2.61% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XPRO has been loosely correlated with OII. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if XPRO jumps, then OII could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XPRO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
XPRO | 100% | -2.61% | ||
OII - XPRO | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.66% | ||
HLX - XPRO | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.22% | ||
PUMP - XPRO | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.12% | ||
TDW - XPRO | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.35% | ||
VAL - XPRO | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.73% | ||
More |