MRC
Price
$13.78
Change
-$0.06 (-0.43%)
Updated
Nov 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.17B
96 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TAGP
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 7 closing price
Capitalization
8.51M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MRC vs TAGP

Header iconMRC vs TAGP Comparison
Open Charts MRC vs TAGPBanner chart's image
MRC Global
Price$13.78
Change-$0.06 (-0.43%)
Volume$1.99M
Capitalization1.17B
Tristar Acquisition Group
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$28K
Capitalization8.51M
MRC vs TAGP Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MRC vs. TAGP commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRC is a Hold and TAGP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (MRC: $13.78 vs. TAGP: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: MRC and TAGP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MRC: 232% vs. TAGP: 176%
Market capitalization -- MRC: $1.17B vs. TAGP: $8.51M
MRC [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $1.17B. TAGP’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $8.51M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $54.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MRC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTAGP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MRC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TAGP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MRC is a better buy in the long-term than TAGP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MRC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TAGP’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MRC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TAGP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TAGP is a better buy in the short-term than MRC.

Price Growth

MRC (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TAGP (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -23.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

MRC is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-0.33% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MRC($1.17B) has a higher market cap than TAGP($8.51M). TAGP YTD gains are higher at: 104.545 vs. MRC (7.825). MRC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 133M vs. TAGP (-58.87K). MRC has more cash in the bank: 75M vs. TAGP (0). TAGP has less debt than MRC: TAGP (40.3M) vs MRC (622M). MRC has higher revenues than TAGP: MRC (2.95B) vs TAGP (0).
MRCTAGPMRC / TAGP
Capitalization1.17B8.51M13,760%
EBITDA133M-58.87K-225,910%
Gain YTD7.825104.5457%
P/E Ratio60.17N/A-
Revenue2.95B0-
Total Cash75M0-
Total Debt622M40.3M1,543%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MRC vs TAGP: Fundamental Ratings
MRC
TAGP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8588
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
31100
SMR RATING
1..100
92100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5440
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
21n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TAGP's Valuation (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MRC (87) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that TAGP’s stock grew somewhat faster than MRC’s over the last 12 months.

MRC's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for TAGP (100) in the null industry. This means that MRC’s stock grew significantly faster than TAGP’s over the last 12 months.

MRC's SMR Rating (92) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as TAGP (100) in the null industry. This means that MRC’s stock grew similarly to TAGP’s over the last 12 months.

TAGP's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as MRC (54) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that TAGP’s stock grew similarly to MRC’s over the last 12 months.

MRC's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for TAGP (100) in the null industry. This means that MRC’s stock grew significantly faster than TAGP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MRCTAGP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
71%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MRC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TAGP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OWSMX18.490.09
+0.49%
Old Westbury Small & Mid Cap Strategies
PXSIX19.660.01
+0.05%
Impax Small Cap Institutional
MNDHX27.61-0.05
-0.18%
MFS New Discovery R3
LEQCX11.88-0.06
-0.50%
LoCorr Dynamic Opportunity C
JARIX14.54-0.08
-0.55%
Easterly Global Real Estate I

MRC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRC has been closely correlated with DNOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MRC jumps, then DNOW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRC
1D Price
Change %
MRC100%
N/A
DNOW - MRC
68%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
WHD - MRC
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.50%
NOV - MRC
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.85%
RES - MRC
57%
Loosely correlated
-3.17%
SLB - MRC
56%
Loosely correlated
-4.09%
More

TAGP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TAGP and MRC have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TAGP and MRC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TAGP
1D Price
Change %
TAGP100%
N/A
MRC - TAGP
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QSEP - TAGP
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
SAPMY - TAGP
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WYGPY - TAGP
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.75%
TOLWF - TAGP
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.73%
More