MRAAF
Price
$20.35
Change
-$1.82 (-8.21%)
Updated
Jan 30 closing price
Capitalization
37.26B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TRUHF
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.01 (-6.25%)
Updated
Jan 29 closing price
Capitalization
393.63M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MRAAF vs TRUHF

Header iconMRAAF vs TRUHF Comparison
Open Charts MRAAF vs TRUHFBanner chart's image
Murata Manufacturing
Price$20.35
Change-$1.82 (-8.21%)
Volume$7.06K
Capitalization37.26B
Truly International Holdings
Price$0.15
Change-$0.01 (-6.25%)
Volume$8.44K
Capitalization393.63M
MRAAF vs TRUHF Comparison Chart in %
MRAAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TRUHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MRAAF vs. TRUHF commentary
Feb 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRAAF is a Hold and TRUHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 03, 2026
Stock price -- (MRAAF: $20.35 vs. TRUHF: $0.15)
Brand notoriety: MRAAF and TRUHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MRAAF: 102% vs. TRUHF: 81%
Market capitalization -- MRAAF: $37.26B vs. TRUHF: $393.63M
MRAAF [@Electronic Components] is valued at $37.26B. TRUHF’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $393.63M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $176.36B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $9.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MRAAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRUHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MRAAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TRUHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TRUHF is a better buy in the long-term than MRAAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MRAAF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRUHF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MRAAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TRUHF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TRUHF is a better buy in the short-term than MRAAF.

Price Growth

MRAAF (@Electronic Components) experienced а -9.73% price change this week, while TRUHF (@Electronic Components) price change was -4.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.98%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (-0.93% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MRAAF($37.3B) has a higher market cap than TRUHF($394M). MRAAF has higher P/E ratio than TRUHF: MRAAF (24.46) vs TRUHF (13.73). TRUHF YTD gains are higher at: 3.741 vs. MRAAF (-9.539). MRAAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 491B vs. TRUHF (2.06B). MRAAF has higher revenues than TRUHF: MRAAF (1.76T) vs TRUHF (15.6B).
MRAAFTRUHFMRAAF / TRUHF
Capitalization37.3B394M9,467%
EBITDA491B2.06B23,858%
Gain YTD-9.5393.741-255%
P/E Ratio24.4613.73178%
Revenue1.76T15.6B11,301%
Total Cash613BN/A-
Total Debt59.9BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MRAAF vs TRUHF: Fundamental Ratings
MRAAF
TRUHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10092
SMR RATING
1..100
7297
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5650
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5464
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TRUHF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as MRAAF (14). This means that TRUHF’s stock grew similarly to MRAAF’s over the last 12 months.

TRUHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as MRAAF (100). This means that TRUHF’s stock grew similarly to MRAAF’s over the last 12 months.

MRAAF's SMR Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as TRUHF (97). This means that MRAAF’s stock grew similarly to TRUHF’s over the last 12 months.

TRUHF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as MRAAF (56). This means that TRUHF’s stock grew similarly to MRAAF’s over the last 12 months.

MRAAF's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as TRUHF (64). This means that MRAAF’s stock grew similarly to TRUHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MRAAFTRUHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
60%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MRAAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TRUHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WNXM.X57.6367150.340290
+0.59%
Wrapped NXM cryptocurrency
MKR.X1431.697500-1.687866
-0.12%
Maker cryptocurrency
CAKE.X1.515169-0.019585
-1.28%
PancakeSwap cryptocurrency
GTC.X0.104304-0.001399
-1.32%
Gitcoin cryptocurrency
NMR.X8.646854-0.675671
-7.25%
Numeraire cryptocurrency

MRAAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MRAAF and MRAAY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MRAAF and MRAAY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRAAF
1D Price
Change %
MRAAF100%
-8.22%
MRAAY - MRAAF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
TTDKY - MRAAF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
TTMI - MRAAF
14%
Poorly correlated
+1.78%
JBL - MRAAF
13%
Poorly correlated
-2.76%
VICR - MRAAF
12%
Poorly correlated
-8.08%
More

TRUHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TRUHF and ZTSTF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRUHF and ZTSTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRUHF
1D Price
Change %
TRUHF100%
N/A
ZTSTF - TRUHF
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.54%
CPSH - TRUHF
22%
Poorly correlated
-13.31%
SNPTF - TRUHF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOTGY - TRUHF
7%
Poorly correlated
-3.88%
MRAAF - TRUHF
2%
Poorly correlated
-8.22%
More