MRAAF
Price
$13.48
Change
-$1.72 (-11.32%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
27.26B
NPEGF
Price
$23.97
Change
+$2.02 (+9.20%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
1.86B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MRAAF vs NPEGF

Header iconMRAAF vs NPEGF Comparison
Open Charts MRAAF vs NPEGFBanner chart's image
Murata Manufacturing
Price$13.48
Change-$1.72 (-11.32%)
Volume$233
Capitalization27.26B
Nippon Electric Glass
Price$23.97
Change+$2.02 (+9.20%)
Volume$220
Capitalization1.86B
MRAAF vs NPEGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MRAAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NPEGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MRAAF vs. NPEGF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRAAF is a Hold and NPEGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MRAAF: $13.48 vs. NPEGF: $23.97)
Brand notoriety: MRAAF and NPEGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MRAAF: 1% vs. NPEGF: 77%
Market capitalization -- MRAAF: $27.26B vs. NPEGF: $1.86B
MRAAF [@Electronic Components] is valued at $27.26B. NPEGF’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $1.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $120.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $6.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MRAAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNPEGF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MRAAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NPEGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NPEGF is a better buy in the long-term than MRAAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MRAAF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NPEGF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MRAAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NPEGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NPEGF is a better buy in the short-term than MRAAF.

Price Growth

MRAAF (@Electronic Components) experienced а +0.28% price change this week, while NPEGF (@Electronic Components) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +1.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+1.55% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MRAAF($27.3B) has a higher market cap than NPEGF($1.86B). NPEGF has higher P/E ratio than MRAAF: NPEGF (21.05) vs MRAAF (15.46). NPEGF YTD gains are higher at: 10.205 vs. MRAAF (-23.850).
MRAAFNPEGFMRAAF / NPEGF
Capitalization27.3B1.86B1,465%
EBITDA458BN/A-
Gain YTD-23.85010.205-234%
P/E Ratio15.4621.0573%
Revenue1.72TN/A-
Total Cash603BN/A-
Total Debt60.7BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MRAAF vs NPEGF: Fundamental Ratings
MRAAF
NPEGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10055
SMR RATING
1..100
7384
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6350
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9716
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NPEGF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as MRAAF (11). This means that NPEGF’s stock grew similarly to MRAAF’s over the last 12 months.

NPEGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MRAAF (100). This means that NPEGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MRAAF’s over the last 12 months.

MRAAF's SMR Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as NPEGF (84). This means that MRAAF’s stock grew similarly to NPEGF’s over the last 12 months.

NPEGF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as MRAAF (63). This means that NPEGF’s stock grew similarly to MRAAF’s over the last 12 months.

NPEGF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MRAAF (97). This means that NPEGF’s stock grew significantly faster than MRAAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MRAAFNPEGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
21%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
23%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
63%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
65%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
14%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MRAAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NPEGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AGFCX15.960.18
+1.14%
Alger Responsible Investing C
TEBIX17.930.08
+0.45%
Franklin Mutual Beacon A
OINCX24.450.10
+0.41%
JPMorgan Equity Income C
PHRAX18.690.04
+0.21%
Virtus Duff & Phelps Real Estate Secs A
RRREX21.870.04
+0.18%
DWS RREEF Real Estate Securities S

MRAAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MRAAF and MRAAY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MRAAF and MRAAY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRAAF
1D Price
Change %
MRAAF100%
-11.32%
MRAAY - MRAAF
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.68%
OMRNF - MRAAF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OMRNY - MRAAF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
NPEGF - MRAAF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOTGY - MRAAF
2%
Poorly correlated
+6.06%
More

NPEGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NPEGF and KOPN have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NPEGF and KOPN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NPEGF
1D Price
Change %
NPEGF100%
N/A
KOPN - NPEGF
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.60%
OST - NPEGF
27%
Poorly correlated
+27.69%
ELTK - NPEGF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
MRAAY - NPEGF
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.68%
MRAAF - NPEGF
3%
Poorly correlated
-11.32%
More