MQBKY
Price
$140.56
Change
-$0.20 (-0.14%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
54.28B
NRSCF
Price
$7.29
Change
+$0.67 (+10.12%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
21.69B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MQBKY vs NRSCF

Header iconMQBKY vs NRSCF Comparison
Open Charts MQBKY vs NRSCFBanner chart's image
Macquarie Group
Price$140.56
Change-$0.20 (-0.14%)
Volume$7.77K
Capitalization54.28B
Nomura Holdings
Price$7.29
Change+$0.67 (+10.12%)
Volume$37.99K
Capitalization21.69B
MQBKY vs NRSCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MQBKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NRSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MQBKY vs. NRSCF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MQBKY is a StrongBuy and NRSCF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (MQBKY: $140.56 vs. NRSCF: $7.29)
Brand notoriety: MQBKY and NRSCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MQBKY: 59% vs. NRSCF: 495%
Market capitalization -- MQBKY: $54.28B vs. NRSCF: $21.69B
MQBKY [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $54.28B. NRSCF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $21.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MQBKY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNRSCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MQBKY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NRSCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NRSCF is a better buy in the long-term than MQBKY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MQBKY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NRSCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MQBKY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NRSCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MQBKY is a better buy in the short-term than NRSCF.

Price Growth

MQBKY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +0.43% price change this week, while NRSCF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +10.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.08%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.19% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MQBKY($54.3B) has a higher market cap than NRSCF($21.7B). MQBKY has higher P/E ratio than NRSCF: MQBKY (21.99) vs NRSCF (8.74). NRSCF YTD gains are higher at: 26.915 vs. MQBKY (4.781). MQBKY has less debt than NRSCF: MQBKY (330B) vs NRSCF (15.59T). NRSCF has higher revenues than MQBKY: NRSCF (1.73T) vs MQBKY (6.79B).
MQBKYNRSCFMQBKY / NRSCF
Capitalization54.3B21.7B250%
EBITDA20.5BN/A-
Gain YTD4.78126.91518%
P/E Ratio21.998.74252%
Revenue6.79B1.73T0%
Total Cash88BN/A-
Total Debt330B15.59T2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MQBKY vs NRSCF: Fundamental Ratings
MQBKY
NRSCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2398
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4147
SMR RATING
1..100
81
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5841
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5776
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NRSCF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as MQBKY (24). This means that NRSCF’s stock grew similarly to MQBKY’s over the last 12 months.

MQBKY's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as NRSCF (47). This means that MQBKY’s stock grew similarly to NRSCF’s over the last 12 months.

NRSCF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as MQBKY (8). This means that NRSCF’s stock grew similarly to MQBKY’s over the last 12 months.

NRSCF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as MQBKY (58). This means that NRSCF’s stock grew similarly to MQBKY’s over the last 12 months.

MQBKY's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as NRSCF (76). This means that MQBKY’s stock grew similarly to NRSCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MQBKYNRSCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
33%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
55%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MQBKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NRSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PBHC15.030.33
+2.24%
Pathfinder Bancorp
BALL53.850.21
+0.39%
Ball Corp
YRD5.89-0.01
-0.17%
Yiren Digital Ltd
BWIN32.84-0.35
-1.05%
The Baldwin Insurance Group Inc.
CAPS1.24-0.05
-3.88%
Capstone Holding Corp

MQBKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MQBKY and JPXGY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MQBKY and JPXGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MQBKY
1D Price
Change %
MQBKY100%
-0.15%
JPXGY - MQBKY
32%
Poorly correlated
+6.26%
CCORF - MQBKY
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
DEFT - MQBKY
28%
Poorly correlated
-11.69%
DBOEY - MQBKY
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
LDNXF - MQBKY
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.26%
More

NRSCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NRSCF and SAIH have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NRSCF and SAIH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NRSCF
1D Price
Change %
NRSCF100%
N/A
SAIH - NRSCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.22%
CCORF - NRSCF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
STGC - NRSCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MIGI - NRSCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-6.17%
MQBKY - NRSCF
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
More