MQBKY
Price
$150.87
Change
+$0.23 (+0.15%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
45.69B
NRSCF
Price
$6.41
Change
+$0.61 (+10.52%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
12.83B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MQBKY vs NRSCF

Header iconMQBKY vs NRSCF Comparison
Open Charts MQBKY vs NRSCFBanner chart's image
Macquarie Group
Price$150.87
Change+$0.23 (+0.15%)
Volume$9.44K
Capitalization45.69B
Nomura Holdings
Price$6.41
Change+$0.61 (+10.52%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization12.83B
MQBKY vs NRSCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MQBKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NRSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MQBKY vs. NRSCF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MQBKY is a StrongBuy and NRSCF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MQBKY: $150.87 vs. NRSCF: $6.41)
Brand notoriety: MQBKY and NRSCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MQBKY: 60% vs. NRSCF: 108%
Market capitalization -- MQBKY: $45.69B vs. NRSCF: $12.83B
MQBKY [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $45.69B. NRSCF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $12.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MQBKY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNRSCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MQBKY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NRSCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MQBKY is a better buy in the long-term than NRSCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MQBKY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NRSCF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MQBKY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NRSCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NRSCF is a better buy in the short-term than MQBKY.

Price Growth

MQBKY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +5.41% price change this week, while NRSCF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +10.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +24.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +112.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+24.10% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MQBKY($45.7B) has a higher market cap than NRSCF($12.8B). NRSCF has higher P/E ratio than MQBKY: NRSCF (18.52) vs MQBKY (13.26). MQBKY YTD gains are higher at: 12.466 vs. NRSCF (11.595). MQBKY has less debt than NRSCF: MQBKY (245B) vs NRSCF (11.4T). NRSCF has higher revenues than MQBKY: NRSCF (1.12T) vs MQBKY (6.56B).
MQBKYNRSCFMQBKY / NRSCF
Capitalization45.7B12.8B357%
EBITDA14.8BN/A-
Gain YTD12.46611.595108%
P/E Ratio13.2618.5272%
Revenue6.56B1.12T1%
Total Cash87.8BN/A-
Total Debt245B11.4T2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MQBKY vs NRSCF: Fundamental Ratings
MQBKY
NRSCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3450
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3150
SMR RATING
1..100
81
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4253
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5396
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NRSCF's Valuation (20) in the null industry is in the same range as MQBKY (36). This means that NRSCF’s stock grew similarly to MQBKY’s over the last 12 months.

MQBKY's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the null industry is in the same range as NRSCF (50). This means that MQBKY’s stock grew similarly to NRSCF’s over the last 12 months.

NRSCF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as MQBKY (8). This means that NRSCF’s stock grew similarly to MQBKY’s over the last 12 months.

MQBKY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as NRSCF (53). This means that MQBKY’s stock grew similarly to NRSCF’s over the last 12 months.

MQBKY's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NRSCF (96). This means that MQBKY’s stock grew somewhat faster than NRSCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MQBKYNRSCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
32%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
66%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
55%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MQBKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NRSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
COHR90.902.54
+2.87%
Coherent Corp
ONEW15.000.34
+2.32%
OneWater Marine
MSGE40.010.34
+0.86%
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp
DYCQU10.82N/A
N/A
DT Cloud Acquisition Corp
ELTK10.28-0.10
-0.96%
Eltek Ltd

MQBKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MQBKY and JPXGY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MQBKY and JPXGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MQBKY
1D Price
Change %
MQBKY100%
+0.15%
JPXGY - MQBKY
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.86%
CCORF - MQBKY
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.25%
DEFT - MQBKY
28%
Poorly correlated
+5.72%
DBOEY - MQBKY
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
LDNXF - MQBKY
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
More

NRSCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NRSCF and SAIH have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NRSCF and SAIH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NRSCF
1D Price
Change %
NRSCF100%
N/A
SAIH - NRSCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.52%
CCORF - NRSCF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.25%
STGC - NRSCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MIGI - NRSCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.19%
MQBKY - NRSCF
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
More