MQ
Price
$3.75
Change
-$0.01 (-0.27%)
Updated
Jan 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.06B
39 days until earnings call
U
Price
$21.77
Change
+$0.02 (+0.09%)
Updated
Jan 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.3B
12 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MQ vs U

Header iconMQ vs U Comparison
Open Charts MQ vs UBanner chart's image
Marqeta
Price$3.75
Change-$0.01 (-0.27%)
Volume$30.94K
Capitalization3.06B
Unity Software
Price$21.77
Change+$0.02 (+0.09%)
Volume$59.32K
Capitalization10.3B
MQ vs U Comparison Chart
Loading...
MQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MQ vs. U commentary
Jan 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MQ is a Hold and U is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 18, 2025
Stock price -- (MQ: $3.77 vs. U: $21.75)
Brand notoriety: MQ and U are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MQ: 69% vs. U: 54%
Market capitalization -- MQ: $3.06B vs. U: $10.3B
MQ [@Packaged Software] is valued at $3.06B. U’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $10.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MQ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • U’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, U is a better buy in the long-term than MQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MQ’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while U’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MQ’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • U’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MQ and U are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MQ (@Packaged Software) experienced а -1.82% price change this week, while U (@Packaged Software) price change was -5.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

MQ is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

U is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.66% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
U($10.3B) has a higher market cap than MQ($3.06B). MQ YTD gains are higher at: -0.528 vs. U (-3.204). U has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -209.35M vs. MQ (-272.27M). U has more cash in the bank: 1.59B vs. MQ (1.25B). MQ has less debt than U: MQ (16.9M) vs U (2.71B). U has higher revenues than MQ: U (2.19B) vs MQ (676M).
MQUMQ / U
Capitalization3.06B10.3B30%
EBITDA-272.27M-209.35M130%
Gain YTD-0.528-3.20416%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue676M2.19B31%
Total Cash1.25B1.59B79%
Total Debt16.9M2.71B1%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MQU
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY591.64-1.14
-0.19%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X99756.910000-747.585940
-0.74%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME27.72-0.24
-0.86%
GameStop Corp
TSLA413.82-14.40
-3.36%
Tesla
AAPL228.26-9.61
-4.04%
Apple

MQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MQ has been loosely correlated with ALRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MQ jumps, then ALRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MQ
1D Price
Change %
MQ100%
-1.05%
ALRM - MQ
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.76%
TDC - MQ
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.48%
BSY - MQ
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
U - MQ
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.32%
UPBD - MQ
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
More

U and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, U has been loosely correlated with STEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if U jumps, then STEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To U
1D Price
Change %
U100%
-1.32%
STEM - U
48%
Loosely correlated
-8.85%
AMPL - U
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.94%
TXG - U
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.73%
TDOC - U
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.03%
PATH - U
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
More