MQ
Price
$3.75
Change
-$0.02 (-0.53%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
3.06B
39 days until earnings call
NPACF
Price
$18.70
Change
-$2.15 (-10.31%)
Updated
Aug 9 closing price
Capitalization
767.63M
Ad is loading...

MQ vs NPACF

Header iconMQ vs NPACF Comparison
Open Charts MQ vs NPACFBanner chart's image
Marqeta
Price$3.75
Change-$0.02 (-0.53%)
Volume$2.08M
Capitalization3.06B
Quadient SA
Price$18.70
Change-$2.15 (-10.31%)
Volume$400
Capitalization767.63M
MQ vs NPACF Comparison Chart
Loading...
MQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MQ vs. NPACF commentary
Jan 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MQ is a Hold and NPACF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 18, 2025
Stock price -- (MQ: $3.75 vs. NPACF: $18.70)
Brand notoriety: MQ and NPACF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MQ: 41% vs. NPACF: 100%
Market capitalization -- MQ: $3.06B vs. NPACF: $767.63M
MQ [@Packaged Software] is valued at $3.06B. NPACF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $767.63M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MQ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNPACF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NPACF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MQ and NPACF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MQ’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MQ’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

MQ (@Packaged Software) experienced а +2.18% price change this week, while NPACF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

MQ is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.14% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MQ($3.06B) has a higher market cap than NPACF($768M). NPACF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. MQ (-1.055). NPACF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 228M vs. MQ (-272.27M). MQ has more cash in the bank: 1.25B vs. NPACF (133M). MQ has less debt than NPACF: MQ (16.9M) vs NPACF (910M). NPACF has higher revenues than MQ: NPACF (1.04B) vs MQ (676M).
MQNPACFMQ / NPACF
Capitalization3.06B768M399%
EBITDA-272.27M228M-119%
Gain YTD-1.0550.000-
P/E RatioN/A9.60-
Revenue676M1.04B65%
Total Cash1.25B133M940%
Total Debt16.9M910M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NPACF: Fundamental Ratings
NPACF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
47
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
83
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
71
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
16

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X104462.0400004705.133000
+4.72%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA426.5012.68
+3.06%
Tesla
SPY597.585.94
+1.00%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL229.981.72
+0.75%
Apple
GME27.51-0.21
-0.76%
GameStop Corp

MQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MQ has been loosely correlated with ALRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MQ jumps, then ALRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MQ
1D Price
Change %
MQ100%
-0.53%
ALRM - MQ
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
TDC - MQ
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.32%
BSY - MQ
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.17%
U - MQ
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
UPBD - MQ
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
More

NPACF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NPACF has been loosely correlated with LKRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NPACF jumps, then LKRY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NPACF
1D Price
Change %
NPACF100%
N/A
LKRY - NPACF
49%
Loosely correlated
N/A
VERX - NPACF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
PUBM - NPACF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
MQ - NPACF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
MITK - NPACF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
More