MPZZF
Price
$1.90
Change
+$0.15 (+8.57%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
843.45M
MSLOF
Price
$32.63
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
11.87B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MPZZF vs MSLOF

Header iconMPZZF vs MSLOF Comparison
Open Charts MPZZF vs MSLOFBanner chart's image
MPC Container Ships AS
Price$1.90
Change+$0.15 (+8.57%)
Volume$53.63K
Capitalization843.45M
Mitsui O.S.K. Lines
Price$32.63
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$300
Capitalization11.87B
MPZZF vs MSLOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSLOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MPZZF vs. MSLOF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MPZZF is a StrongBuy and MSLOF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (MPZZF: $1.90 vs. MSLOF: $32.63)
Brand notoriety: MPZZF and MSLOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MPZZF: 132% vs. MSLOF: 116%
Market capitalization -- MPZZF: $843.45M vs. MSLOF: $11.87B
MPZZF [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $843.45M. MSLOF’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $11.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $34.59B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MPZZF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMSLOF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MPZZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MSLOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MPZZF is a better buy in the long-term than MSLOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MPZZF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSLOF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MPZZF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MSLOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MPZZF and MSLOF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MPZZF (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +2.98% price change this week, while MSLOF (@Marine Shipping) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +3.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.06%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+3.07% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSLOF($11.9B) has a higher market cap than MPZZF($843M). MSLOF has higher P/E ratio than MPZZF: MSLOF (4.03) vs MPZZF (3.39). MPZZF YTD gains are higher at: 7.743 vs. MSLOF (-6.771). MPZZF has less debt than MSLOF: MPZZF (433M) vs MSLOF (1.37T).
MPZZFMSLOFMPZZF / MSLOF
Capitalization843M11.9B7%
EBITDAN/A505B-
Gain YTD7.743-6.771-114%
P/E Ratio3.394.0384%
RevenueN/A1.74T-
Total CashN/A148B-
Total Debt433M1.37T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MPZZF vs MSLOF: Fundamental Ratings
MPZZF
MSLOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10049
SMR RATING
1..100
319
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4158
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4391
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MPZZF's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as MSLOF (9). This means that MPZZF’s stock grew similarly to MSLOF’s over the last 12 months.

MSLOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MPZZF (100). This means that MSLOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MPZZF’s over the last 12 months.

MSLOF's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as MPZZF (31). This means that MSLOF’s stock grew similarly to MPZZF’s over the last 12 months.

MPZZF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as MSLOF (58). This means that MPZZF’s stock grew similarly to MSLOF’s over the last 12 months.

MPZZF's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MSLOF (91). This means that MPZZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MSLOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MPZZFMSLOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
70%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
81%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSLOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FFIC12.340.21
+1.73%
Flushing Financial Corp
PSIX90.521.00
+1.12%
Power Solutions International Inc
OHI39.110.11
+0.28%
Omega Healthcare Investors
USLM107.490.01
+0.01%
United States Lime & Minerals
BANFP25.81N/A
N/A
BancFirst Corp

MPZZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MPZZF has been loosely correlated with AMKBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MPZZF jumps, then AMKBY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MPZZF
1D Price
Change %
MPZZF100%
+8.57%
AMKBY - MPZZF
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.50%
HLAGF - MPZZF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NPNYY - MPZZF
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
MSLOY - MPZZF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.42%
AMKAF - MPZZF
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.82%
More

MSLOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MSLOF and HLAGF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSLOF and HLAGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSLOF
1D Price
Change %
MSLOF100%
N/A
HLAGF - MSLOF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KAKKF - MSLOF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NYUKF - MSLOF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MPZZF - MSLOF
20%
Poorly correlated
+8.57%
MSLOY - MSLOF
19%
Poorly correlated
+1.42%
More