MPVDF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
71.6M
38 days until earnings call
NSVLF
Price
$0.24
Change
+$0.02 (+9.09%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
1.3M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MPVDF vs NSVLF

Header iconMPVDF vs NSVLF Comparison
Open Charts MPVDF vs NSVLFBanner chart's image
Mountain Province Diamonds
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.31K
Capitalization71.6M
AUQ GOLD MNG
Price$0.24
Change+$0.02 (+9.09%)
Volume$20K
Capitalization1.3M
MPVDF vs NSVLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MPVDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NSVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MPVDF vs. NSVLF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MPVDF is a Hold and NSVLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (MPVDF: $0.04 vs. NSVLF: $0.24)
Brand notoriety: MPVDF and NSVLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MPVDF: 4% vs. NSVLF: 147%
Market capitalization -- MPVDF: $71.6M vs. NSVLF: $1.3M
MPVDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $71.6M. NSVLF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.3M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MPVDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNSVLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MPVDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NSVLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MPVDF and NSVLF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MPVDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NSVLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MPVDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NSVLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NSVLF is a better buy in the short-term than MPVDF.

Price Growth

MPVDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -6.63% price change this week, while NSVLF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

MPVDF is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MPVDF($71.6M) has a higher market cap than NSVLF($1.3M). NSVLF YTD gains are higher at: 97.500 vs. MPVDF (-45.257). MPVDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 392M vs. NSVLF (-161.43K). MPVDF has more cash in the bank: 79.3M vs. NSVLF (43.3K). NSVLF has less debt than MPVDF: NSVLF (219K) vs MPVDF (405M). MPVDF has higher revenues than NSVLF: MPVDF (378M) vs NSVLF (0).
MPVDFNSVLFMPVDF / NSVLF
Capitalization71.6M1.3M5,529%
EBITDA392M-161.43K-242,833%
Gain YTD-45.25797.500-46%
P/E Ratio0.36N/A-
Revenue378M0-
Total Cash79.3M43.3K183,141%
Total Debt405M219K184,932%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MPVDF vs NSVLF: Fundamental Ratings
MPVDF
NSVLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9750
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
12100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9035
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MPVDF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is in the same range as NSVLF (49). This means that MPVDF’s stock grew similarly to NSVLF’s over the last 12 months.

MPVDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NSVLF (100). This means that MPVDF’s stock grew similarly to NSVLF’s over the last 12 months.

MPVDF's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NSVLF (100). This means that MPVDF’s stock grew significantly faster than NSVLF’s over the last 12 months.

NSVLF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MPVDF (90). This means that NSVLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MPVDF’s over the last 12 months.

MPVDF's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as NSVLF (100). This means that MPVDF’s stock grew similarly to NSVLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MPVDFNSVLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MPVDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NSVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HEWA0.10N/A
N/A
HealthWarehouse.com, Inc.
LJUIF0.70N/A
N/A
SSY GROUP LTD
IARGF12.00N/A
N/A
I A R Systems Group AB
SNTMF0.05N/A
N/A
SENSETIME GROUP INC.
CICHF1.03N/A
-0.48%
China Construction Bank Corp.

MPVDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MPVDF and JDNRF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MPVDF and JDNRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MPVDF
1D Price
Change %
MPVDF100%
-8.60%
JDNRF - MPVDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSVLF - MPVDF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HAMRF - MPVDF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SAPLF - MPVDF
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.52%
TFPM - MPVDF
4%
Poorly correlated
-3.15%
More

NSVLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NSVLF has been loosely correlated with INCAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NSVLF jumps, then INCAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSVLF
1D Price
Change %
NSVLF100%
N/A
INCAF - NSVLF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RDEXF - NSVLF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.95%
RMLRF - NSVLF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.56%
MPVDF - NSVLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-8.60%
NVGLF - NSVLF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.72%
More