MPNGY
Price
$24.70
Change
+$0.06 (+0.24%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
75.23B
109 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VIPS
Price
$19.93
Change
+$0.18 (+0.91%)
Updated
Dec 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.73B
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MPNGY vs VIPS

Header iconMPNGY vs VIPS Comparison
Open Charts MPNGY vs VIPSBanner chart's image
MEITUAN
Price$24.70
Change+$0.06 (+0.24%)
Volume$365.14K
Capitalization75.23B
Vipshop Holdings
Price$19.93
Change+$0.18 (+0.91%)
Volume$18.74K
Capitalization9.73B
MPNGY vs VIPS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MPNGY vs. VIPS commentary
Dec 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MPNGY is a Hold and VIPS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 05, 2025
Stock price -- (MPNGY: $24.70 vs. VIPS: $19.74)
Brand notoriety: MPNGY: Not notable vs. VIPS: Notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MPNGY: 84% vs. VIPS: 72%
Market capitalization -- MPNGY: $75.23B vs. VIPS: $9.73B
MPNGY [@Internet Retail] is valued at $75.23B. VIPS’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $9.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.48T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $52.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MPNGY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVIPS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MPNGY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VIPS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, VIPS is a better buy in the long-term than MPNGY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MPNGY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VIPS’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MPNGY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VIPS’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VIPS is a better buy in the short-term than MPNGY.

Price Growth

MPNGY (@Internet Retail) experienced а -6.26% price change this week, while VIPS (@Internet Retail) price change was -0.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +2.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +122.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

MPNGY is expected to report earnings on Mar 23, 2026.

VIPS is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (+2.89% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MPNGY($75.2B) has a higher market cap than VIPS($9.73B). MPNGY has higher P/E ratio than VIPS: MPNGY (18.62) vs VIPS (10.48). VIPS YTD gains are higher at: 52.104 vs. MPNGY (-36.357).
MPNGYVIPSMPNGY / VIPS
Capitalization75.2B9.73B773%
EBITDAN/A9.12B-
Gain YTD-36.35752.104-70%
P/E Ratio18.6210.48178%
RevenueN/A106B-
Total CashN/A27.2B-
Total DebtN/A7.32B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MPNGY vs VIPS: Fundamental Ratings
MPNGY
VIPS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6430
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8949
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7939
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9612
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VIPS's Valuation (25) in the Internet Retail industry is significantly better than the same rating for MPNGY (92) in the null industry. This means that VIPS’s stock grew significantly faster than MPNGY’s over the last 12 months.

VIPS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Internet Retail industry is in the same range as MPNGY (100) in the null industry. This means that VIPS’s stock grew similarly to MPNGY’s over the last 12 months.

VIPS's SMR Rating (49) in the Internet Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MPNGY (89) in the null industry. This means that VIPS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MPNGY’s over the last 12 months.

VIPS's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Internet Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MPNGY (79) in the null industry. This means that VIPS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MPNGY’s over the last 12 months.

VIPS's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Internet Retail industry is significantly better than the same rating for MPNGY (96) in the null industry. This means that VIPS’s stock grew significantly faster than MPNGY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MPNGYVIPS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MPNGY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VIPS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSGS30.760.25
+0.83%
First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF
JOET42.500.27
+0.64%
Virtus Terranova US Quality Momentum ETF
IAUG28.180.11
+0.40%
Innovator Intl Dev Pwr Bffr ETF - Aug
CCMG31.39N/A
N/A
CCM Global Equity ETF
BLCR41.70-0.15
-0.35%
iShares Large Cap Core Active ETF

MPNGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MPNGY has been closely correlated with MPNGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MPNGY jumps, then MPNGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MPNGY
1D Price
Change %
MPNGY100%
+0.24%
MPNGF - MPNGY
73%
Closely correlated
-2.74%
BABA - MPNGY
68%
Closely correlated
-1.89%
JD - MPNGY
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.60%
BZUN - MPNGY
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.15%
BABAF - MPNGY
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
More

VIPS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VIPS has been loosely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VIPS jumps, then JD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VIPS
1D Price
Change %
VIPS100%
-2.71%
JD - VIPS
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.60%
PDD - VIPS
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.43%
BABA - VIPS
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.89%
MPNGY - VIPS
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
RERE - VIPS
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
More