MPFRF
Price
$3.60
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
6.38B
SUND
Price
$0.53
Change
+$0.02 (+3.92%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
15.32M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MPFRF vs SUND

Header iconMPFRF vs SUND Comparison
Open Charts MPFRF vs SUNDBanner chart's image
Mapfre SA
Price$3.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$190
Capitalization6.38B
Sundance Strategies
Price$0.53
Change+$0.02 (+3.92%)
Volume$21.72K
Capitalization15.32M
MPFRF vs SUND Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MPFRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SUND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MPFRF vs. SUND commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MPFRF is a Hold and SUND is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (MPFRF: $3.60 vs. SUND: $0.53)
Brand notoriety: MPFRF and SUND are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MPFRF: 18% vs. SUND: 284%
Market capitalization -- MPFRF: $6.38B vs. SUND: $15.32M
MPFRF [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $6.38B. SUND’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $15.32M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $21.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MPFRF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSUND’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MPFRF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SUND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MPFRF is a better buy in the long-term than SUND.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MPFRF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SUND’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MPFRF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SUND’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MPFRF and SUND are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MPFRF (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SUND (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was +51.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +1.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (+1.79% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MPFRF($6.39B) has a higher market cap than SUND($15.3M). MPFRF YTD gains are higher at: 35.084 vs. SUND (-17.259). MPFRF has more cash in the bank: 1.99B vs. SUND (3.16K). SUND has less debt than MPFRF: SUND (3.26M) vs MPFRF (3.32B). MPFRF has higher revenues than SUND: MPFRF (22.3B) vs SUND (0).
MPFRFSUNDMPFRF / SUND
Capitalization6.39B15.3M41,732%
EBITDAN/A-3.04M-
Gain YTD35.084-17.259-203%
P/E Ratio8.55N/A-
Revenue22.3B0-
Total Cash1.99B3.16K62,919,569%
Total Debt3.32B3.26M102,058%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MPFRF vs SUND: Fundamental Ratings
MPFRF
SUND
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
13100
SMR RATING
1..100
28100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4241
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3971
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MPFRF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SUND (89). This means that MPFRF’s stock grew significantly faster than SUND’s over the last 12 months.

MPFRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SUND (100). This means that MPFRF’s stock grew significantly faster than SUND’s over the last 12 months.

MPFRF's SMR Rating (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SUND (100). This means that MPFRF’s stock grew significantly faster than SUND’s over the last 12 months.

SUND's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as MPFRF (42). This means that SUND’s stock grew similarly to MPFRF’s over the last 12 months.

MPFRF's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as SUND (71). This means that MPFRF’s stock grew similarly to SUND’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MPFRFSUND
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MPFRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SUND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SSO96.740.82
+0.85%
ProShares Ultra S&P500
JBK25.500.20
+0.79%
Lehman ABS Corp
SSUS44.680.18
+0.40%
Day Hagan Smart Sector ETF
ISWN20.550.08
+0.40%
Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF
BMN24.64-0.20
-0.81%
BlackRock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust

MPFRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MPFRF and SUND have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MPFRF and SUND's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MPFRF
1D Price
Change %
MPFRF100%
N/A
SUND - MPFRF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.92%
BLHEY - MPFRF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AXAHY - MPFRF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
IAFNF - MPFRF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DIISY - MPFRF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SUND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SUND and SLF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SUND and SLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SUND
1D Price
Change %
SUND100%
+3.92%
SLF - SUND
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
MPFRF - SUND
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SAXPY - SUND
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
NNGRY - SUND
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
SAXPF - SUND
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More