Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MPEMX vs RNWHX
MPEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts MPEMX vs RNWHX
Mondrian Emerging Markets Value Equity
Price$10.74
Change-$0.09 (-0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$97.08
Change-$0.45 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
MPEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MPEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MPEMX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. MPEMX (22M). MPEMX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: MPEMX (3.62) vs RNWHX (1.25). MPEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: MPEMX (18 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). MPEMX (1.51) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. MPEMX (40.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than MPEMX: RNWHX (250) vs MPEMX (50000). MPEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.51 vs. RNWHX (27.68). MPEMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.93 vs. RNWHX (11.69).
| MPEMX | RNWHX | MPEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.72 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.72 | 210% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.173 | 6.092 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 250 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22M | 75.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.62 | 1.25 | 288% |
| Returns for 1 year | 50.51 | 27.68 | 182% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.25 | 43.24 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.93 | 11.69 | 265% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.07 | 124.21 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement