MPB
Price
$26.70
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
331.64M
87 days until earnings call
SFNC
Price
$19.68
Change
+$0.02 (+0.10%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.42B
93 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MPB vs SFNC

Header iconMPB vs SFNC Comparison
Open Charts MPB vs SFNCBanner chart's image
Mid Penn Ban
Price$26.70
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$287.8K
Capitalization331.64M
Simmons First National
Price$19.68
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
Volume$1.89M
Capitalization2.42B
MPB vs SFNC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MPB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MPB vs. SFNC commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MPB is a Hold and SFNC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (MPB: $26.70 vs. SFNC: $19.68)
Brand notoriety: MPB and SFNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MPB: 296% vs. SFNC: 156%
Market capitalization -- MPB: $331.64M vs. SFNC: $2.42B
MPB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $331.64M. SFNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MPB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSFNC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MPB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SFNC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SFNC is a better buy in the long-term than MPB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MPB’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFNC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MPB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SFNC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MPB is a better buy in the short-term than SFNC.

Price Growth

MPB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -7.77% price change this week, while SFNC (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

MPB is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

SFNC is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFNC($2.42B) has a higher market cap than MPB($332M). SFNC has higher P/E ratio than MPB: SFNC (13.98) vs MPB (8.80). MPB YTD gains are higher at: -6.155 vs. SFNC (-9.313). SFNC has more cash in the bank: 345M vs. MPB (52.5M). MPB has less debt than SFNC: MPB (254M) vs SFNC (1.34B). SFNC has higher revenues than MPB: SFNC (782M) vs MPB (168M).
MPBSFNCMPB / SFNC
Capitalization332M2.42B14%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-6.155-9.31366%
P/E Ratio8.8013.9863%
Revenue168M782M21%
Total Cash52.5M345M15%
Total Debt254M1.34B19%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MPB vs SFNC: Fundamental Ratings
MPB
SFNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6612
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4969
SMR RATING
1..100
2312
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7656
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8249
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MPB's Valuation (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (33) in the Major Banks industry. This means that MPB’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

MPB's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (69) in the Major Banks industry. This means that MPB’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

SFNC's SMR Rating (12) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MPB (23) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SFNC’s stock grew similarly to MPB’s over the last 12 months.

SFNC's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MPB (76) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SFNC’s stock grew similarly to MPB’s over the last 12 months.

SFNC's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MPB (82) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SFNC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MPB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MPBSFNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
61%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MPB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JDVFX24.470.13
+0.53%
JHancock Disciplined Value R4
HGXFX16.990.08
+0.47%
Hartford Global Impact F
GRSIX10.880.05
+0.46%
Brookfield Next Generation Infras I
GSBUX27.130.05
+0.18%
Goldman Sachs Income Builder R6
CWVIX27.440.01
+0.04%
Calvert International Equity I

MPB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MPB has been closely correlated with MOFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MPB jumps, then MOFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MPB
1D Price
Change %
MPB100%
N/A
MOFG - MPB
81%
Closely correlated
-4.04%
HBNC - MPB
80%
Closely correlated
+1.10%
SFNC - MPB
78%
Closely correlated
+0.10%
UVSP - MPB
78%
Closely correlated
-0.78%
TCBK - MPB
78%
Closely correlated
+1.92%
More

SFNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFNC has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFNC jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFNC
1D Price
Change %
SFNC100%
+0.10%
UBSI - SFNC
91%
Closely correlated
-1.07%
UCB - SFNC
91%
Closely correlated
+0.54%
HOPE - SFNC
90%
Closely correlated
N/A
ABCB - SFNC
90%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
BHLB - SFNC
90%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
More