Advertisement
MP vs TMC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MP is a Hold and TMC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTMC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- MP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TMC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
- TMC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
MP (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +8.72% price change this week, while TMC (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -6.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +167.93%.
Reported Earning Dates
MP is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.
TMC is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.70% weekly)The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
| MP | TMC | MP / TMC | |
| Capitalization | 10.6B | 2.29B | 462% |
| EBITDA | -28.67M | -127.49M | 22% |
| Gain YTD | 282.821 | 403.571 | 70% |
| P/E Ratio | 770.50 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 242M | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 754M | 116M | 650% |
| Total Debt | 917M | 2.48M | 37,006% |
| MP | TMC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 81% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LCF | 41.96 | N/A | N/A |
| Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF | |||
| GAPR | 39.51 | -0.03 | -0.07% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buf ETF - Apr | |||
| XOVR | 20.76 | -0.09 | -0.43% |
| ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF | |||
| ETW | 9.14 | -0.04 | -0.44% |
| Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund | |||
| XPAY | 54.93 | -0.96 | -1.72% |
| Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF | |||
MP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MP has been loosely correlated with LYSDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MP jumps, then LYSDY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MP | 100% | -3.60% | ||
| LYSDY - MP | 45% Loosely correlated | -3.66% | ||
| FSUGY - MP | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| USAR - MP | 43% Loosely correlated | -4.78% | ||
| TMC - MP | 43% Loosely correlated | -3.26% | ||
| LYSCF - MP | 42% Loosely correlated | -2.77% | ||
More | ||||
TMC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMC has been loosely correlated with MP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMC jumps, then MP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMC | 100% | -3.26% | ||
| MP - TMC | 43% Loosely correlated | -3.60% | ||
| USAR - TMC | 36% Loosely correlated | -4.78% | ||
| UAMY - TMC | 30% Poorly correlated | -5.58% | ||
| OMEX - TMC | 29% Poorly correlated | +4.67% | ||
| NB - TMC | 28% Poorly correlated | +2.68% | ||
More | ||||