MP
Price
$30.55
Change
+$1.35 (+4.62%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.37B
46 days until earnings call
RTPPF
Price
$57.90
Change
+$0.21 (+0.36%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
107.7B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MP vs RTPPF

Header iconMP vs RTPPF Comparison
Open Charts MP vs RTPPFBanner chart's image
MP Materials
Price$30.55
Change+$1.35 (+4.62%)
Volume$25.33M
Capitalization2.37B
Rio Tinto
Price$57.90
Change+$0.21 (+0.36%)
Volume$2.02K
Capitalization107.7B
MP vs RTPPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
MP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MP vs. RTPPF commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MP is a Hold and RTPPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (MP: $30.55 vs. RTPPF: $57.90)
Brand notoriety: MP and RTPPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MP: 274% vs. RTPPF: 203%
Market capitalization -- MP: $2.37B vs. RTPPF: $107.7B
MP [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $2.37B. RTPPF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $107.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRTPPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RTPPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MP is a better buy in the long-term than RTPPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

MP (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +18.87% price change this week, while RTPPF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -2.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

MP is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.32% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RTPPF($108B) has a higher market cap than MP($2.37B). MP has higher P/E ratio than RTPPF: MP (107.71) vs RTPPF (12.42). MP YTD gains are higher at: 95.833 vs. RTPPF (4.311). RTPPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 20.7B vs. MP (94M). RTPPF has more cash in the bank: 10.5B vs. MP (998M). MP has less debt than RTPPF: MP (689M) vs RTPPF (14.1B). RTPPF has higher revenues than MP: RTPPF (52.4B) vs MP (253M).
MPRTPPFMP / RTPPF
Capitalization2.37B108B2%
EBITDA94M20.7B0%
Gain YTD95.8334.3112,223%
P/E Ratio107.7112.42867%
Revenue253M52.4B0%
Total Cash998M10.5B10%
Total Debt689M14.1B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RTPPF: Fundamental Ratings
RTPPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
54
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
77
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLEIX14.180.05
+0.35%
GS Energy Infrastructure Fd Inv Shares
GQFPX12.28-0.06
-0.49%
GQG Partners Global Quality Value Fd Inv
JLVRX20.04-0.21
-1.04%
JPMorgan Large Cap Value R5
BIGIX30.04-0.37
-1.22%
William Blair International Growth I
RYAZX187.11-2.96
-1.56%
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Value H

MP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MP has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MP jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MP
1D Price
Change %
MP100%
+4.62%
LAC - MP
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.76%
SGML - MP
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.14%
LAR - MP
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
SCCO - MP
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
PLL - MP
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.73%
More

RTPPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RTPPF and RIO have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RTPPF and RIO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RTPPF
1D Price
Change %
RTPPF100%
+0.37%
RIO - RTPPF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.16%
MP - RTPPF
24%
Poorly correlated
+4.62%
FCX - RTPPF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
CPPKF - RTPPF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.35%
BHP - RTPPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.53%
More