MP
Price
$20.87
Change
-$0.07 (-0.33%)
Updated
Jan 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.37B
29 days until earnings call
PLL
Price
$9.09
Change
+$0.02 (+0.22%)
Updated
Jan 21 closing price
Capitalization
256.53M
35 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

MP vs PLL

Header iconMP vs PLL Comparison
Open Charts MP vs PLLBanner chart's image
MP Materials
Price$20.87
Change-$0.07 (-0.33%)
Volume$3M
Capitalization2.37B
Piedmont Lithium
Price$9.09
Change+$0.02 (+0.22%)
Volume$538.48K
Capitalization256.53M
MP vs PLL Comparison Chart
Loading...
MP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MP vs. PLL commentary
Jan 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MP is a Hold and PLL is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 22, 2025
Stock price -- (MP: $20.87 vs. PLL: $9.09)
Brand notoriety: MP and PLL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MP: 98% vs. PLL: 101%
Market capitalization -- MP: $2.37B vs. PLL: $256.53M
MP [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $2.37B. PLL’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $256.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePLL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PLL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MP is a better buy in the long-term than PLL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

MP (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +7.63% price change this week, while PLL (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +2.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

MP is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

PLL is expected to report earnings on May 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MP($2.37B) has a higher market cap than PLL($257M). MP YTD gains are higher at: 33.782 vs. PLL (4.005). MP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 94M vs. PLL (-18.36M). MP has more cash in the bank: 998M vs. PLL (72.2M). PLL has less debt than MP: PLL (1.57M) vs MP (689M). MP has higher revenues than PLL: MP (253M) vs PLL (39.8M).
MPPLLMP / PLL
Capitalization2.37B257M923%
EBITDA94M-18.36M-512%
Gain YTD33.7824.005844%
P/E Ratio107.71N/A-
Revenue253M39.8M636%
Total Cash998M72.2M1,382%
Total Debt689M1.57M43,997%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PLL: Fundamental Ratings
PLL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
97
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
84
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X106146.2660004129.601600
+4.05%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY603.055.47
+0.92%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME27.47-0.04
-0.15%
GameStop Corp
TSLA424.07-2.43
-0.57%
Tesla
AAPL222.64-7.34
-3.19%
Apple

MP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MP has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MP jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MP
1D Price
Change %
MP100%
-0.33%
LAC - MP
49%
Loosely correlated
-8.31%
HBM - MP
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.44%
PLL - MP
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
IE - MP
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.94%
SGML - MP
41%
Loosely correlated
-3.91%
More

PLL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLL has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLL jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLL
1D Price
Change %
PLL100%
+0.17%
LAC - PLL
54%
Loosely correlated
-8.31%
SGML - PLL
49%
Loosely correlated
-3.91%
VALE - PLL
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
MP - PLL
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.33%
MTRN - PLL
43%
Loosely correlated
+3.03%
More