Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MOO vs XLB
MOO vs XLB Comparison
Open Charts MOO vs XLB
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
Price$73.77
Change+$0.37 (+0.50%)
Volume$169
Net Assets583.32M
State Street®MatSelSectSPDR®ETF
Price$88.99
Change+$0.62 (+0.70%)
Volume$5.92M
Net Assets5.14B
MOO vs XLB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MOO vs. XLB commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MOO is a Buy and XLB is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLB has more net assets: 5.14B vs. MOO (583M). MOO has a higher annual dividend yield than XLB: MOO (13.763) vs XLB (6.541). MOO was incepted earlier than XLB: MOO (18 years) vs XLB (27 years). XLB (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than MOO (0.55). XLB has a higher turnover MOO (12.00) vs MOO (12.00).
| MOO | XLB | MOO / XLB | |
| Gain YTD | 13.763 | 6.541 | 210% |
| Net Assets | 583M | 5.14B | 11% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.08 | 688% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 13.00 | 92% |
| Yield | 3.01 | 1.92 | 157% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 27 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MOO | XLB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 81% | 17 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 6 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 79% | 6 days ago 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
MOO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOO has been closely correlated with CTVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MOO jumps, then CTVA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MOO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOO | 100% | +0.20% | ||
| CTVA - MOO | 69% Closely correlated | -1.40% | ||
| CNH - MOO | 69% Closely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| DE - MOO | 69% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| MOS - MOO | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.32% | ||
| AGCO - MOO | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.42% | ||
More | ||||
XLB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLB has been closely correlated with DD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLB jumps, then DD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y