Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MOO vs XLB
MOO vs XLB Comparison
Open Charts MOO vs XLB
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
Price$72.73
Change+$0.23 (+0.32%)
Volume$33.62K
Net Assets575.65M
State Street®MatSelSectSPDR®ETF
Price$45.84
Change+$0.09 (+0.20%)
Volume$2.77M
Net Assets5.48B
MOO vs XLB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MOO vs. XLB commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MOO is a StrongBuy and XLB is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLB has more net assets: 5.48B vs. MOO (576M). MOO has a higher annual dividend yield than XLB: MOO (12.725) vs XLB (10.556). MOO was incepted earlier than XLB: MOO (18 years) vs XLB (27 years). XLB (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than MOO (0.55). XLB has a higher turnover MOO (12.00) vs MOO (12.00).
| MOO | XLB | MOO / XLB | |
| Gain YTD | 12.725 | 10.556 | 121% |
| Net Assets | 576M | 5.48B | 11% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.08 | 688% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 29.00 | 41% |
| Yield | 3.01 | 1.92 | 157% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 27 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MOO | XLB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 81% | 17 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
MOO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOO has been closely correlated with DE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MOO jumps, then DE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MOO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOO | 100% | +0.32% | ||
| DE - MOO | 69% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| CNH - MOO | 67% Closely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| CTVA - MOO | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| MOS - MOO | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| AGCO - MOO | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.30% | ||
More | ||||
XLB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLB has been closely correlated with DD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLB jumps, then DD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y