Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MOO vs XLB
MOO vs XLB Comparison
Open Charts MOO vs XLB
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
Price$74.19
Change+$0.28 (+0.38%)
Volume$78.32K
Net Assets617.69M
The Materials Select Sector SPDR® ETF
Price$87.38
Change-$1.03 (-1.17%)
Volume$7.14M
Net Assets5.15B
MOO vs XLB Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MOO vs. XLB commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MOO is a Buy and XLB is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLB has more net assets: 5.15B vs. MOO (618M). MOO has a higher annual dividend yield than XLB: MOO (14.988) vs XLB (4.346). MOO was incepted earlier than XLB: MOO (18 years) vs XLB (27 years). XLB (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than MOO (0.55). XLB has a higher turnover MOO (12.00) vs MOO (12.00).
| MOO | XLB | MOO / XLB | |
| Gain YTD | 14.988 | 4.346 | 345% |
| Net Assets | 618M | 5.15B | 12% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.08 | 688% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 13.00 | 92% |
| Yield | 3.04 | 1.96 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 27 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MOO | XLB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 24 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
MOO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOO has been closely correlated with CTVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MOO jumps, then CTVA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MOO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOO | 100% | +0.37% | ||
| CTVA - MOO | 74% Closely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| CNH - MOO | 71% Closely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| NTR - MOO | 66% Loosely correlated | +4.05% | ||
| DE - MOO | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.41% | ||
| AGCO - MOO | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.33% | ||
More | ||||
XLB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLB has been closely correlated with LIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLB jumps, then LIN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y