MOHCF
Price
$23.00
Change
-$1.45 (-5.93%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Capitalization
3.43B
NZRFF
Price
$1.00
Change
-$0.15 (-13.04%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
517.28M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MOHCF vs NZRFF

Header iconMOHCF vs NZRFF Comparison
Open Charts MOHCF vs NZRFFBanner chart's image
Motor Oil (Hellas) Corinth Refineries S.A
Price$23.00
Change-$1.45 (-5.93%)
Volume$200
Capitalization3.43B
CHANNEL INFRASTRUCTURE NZ
Price$1.00
Change-$0.15 (-13.04%)
Volume$2.77K
Capitalization517.28M
MOHCF vs NZRFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MOHCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NZRFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MOHCF vs. NZRFF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MOHCF is a Buy and NZRFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (MOHCF: $23.00 vs. NZRFF: $1.00)
Brand notoriety: MOHCF and NZRFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil Refining/Marketing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MOHCF: 100% vs. NZRFF: 115%
Market capitalization -- MOHCF: $3.43B vs. NZRFF: $517.28M
MOHCF [@Oil Refining/Marketing] is valued at $3.43B. NZRFF’s [@Oil Refining/Marketing] market capitalization is $517.28M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry ranges from $49.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry is $6.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MOHCF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNZRFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MOHCF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NZRFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NZRFF is a better buy in the long-term than MOHCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MOHCF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NZRFF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MOHCF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • NZRFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MOHCF and NZRFF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MOHCF (@Oil Refining/Marketing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NZRFF (@Oil Refining/Marketing) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil Refining/Marketing industry was +1.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.99%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil Refining/Marketing (+1.55% weekly)

The Oil Refining/Marketing segment includes companies that refine crude oil into a number of petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel, and then sell the usable products to the end users. These companies are involved in what’s called downstream operations in the oil business. They also engage in the marketing and distribution of crude oil and natural gas products. In other words, the downstream oil and gas business is focused on post-production processes of crude oil and natural gas. When oil prices slump, downstream businesses are hurt less or in some cases even benefit, since their purchase cost of crude oil goes down. Some of the biggest U.S. oil refining/marketing companies include Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Valero Energy Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MOHCF($3.43B) has a higher market cap than NZRFF($517M). NZRFF has higher P/E ratio than MOHCF: NZRFF (24.59) vs MOHCF (7.86). MOHCF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. NZRFF (-12.292). MOHCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 893M vs. NZRFF (95M). MOHCF has more cash in the bank: 1.08B vs. NZRFF (5.77M). NZRFF has less debt than MOHCF: NZRFF (301M) vs MOHCF (3.14B). MOHCF has higher revenues than NZRFF: MOHCF (11.9B) vs NZRFF (140M).
MOHCFNZRFFMOHCF / NZRFF
Capitalization3.43B517M664%
EBITDA893M95M940%
Gain YTD0.000-12.292-
P/E Ratio7.8624.5932%
Revenue11.9B140M8,500%
Total Cash1.08B5.77M18,718%
Total Debt3.14B301M1,044%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NZRFF: Fundamental Ratings
NZRFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
42
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
49
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
26
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
41

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MOHCFNZRFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
9%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
12%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MOHCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NZRFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USTCX31.07N/A
N/A
Victory Science & Technology Class A
USDAUD1.54N/A
N/A
United States Dollar - Australian Dollar
HKDCNY0.92N/A
N/A
Hong Kong Dollar - China Yuan
JDVCX16.44-0.02
-0.12%
JPMorgan Diversified C
BUFMX16.92-0.03
-0.18%
Buffalo Mid Cap Growth

MOHCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOHCF has been loosely correlated with DKL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MOHCF jumps, then DKL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MOHCF
1D Price
Change %
MOHCF100%
N/A
DKL - MOHCF
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
CTXAY - MOHCF
12%
Poorly correlated
+2.03%
CSAN - MOHCF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
FGPR - MOHCF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.93%
NTOIY - MOHCF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
More

NZRFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NZRFF and SPTJF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NZRFF and SPTJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NZRFF
1D Price
Change %
NZRFF100%
N/A
SPTJF - NZRFF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RBSFY - NZRFF
2%
Poorly correlated
+3.26%
OILRF - NZRFF
1%
Poorly correlated
-11.11%
MOHCF - NZRFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTXAF - NZRFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More