MNXXF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
11.78M
SXOOF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
24.01M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MNXXF vs SXOOF

Header iconMNXXF vs SXOOF Comparison
Open Charts MNXXF vs SXOOFBanner chart's image
Manganese X Energy
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$101.09K
Capitalization11.78M
St Georges Eco Mng
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization24.01M
MNXXF vs SXOOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MNXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SXOOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNXXF vs. SXOOF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNXXF is a Hold and SXOOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MNXXF: $0.04 vs. SXOOF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: MNXXF and SXOOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNXXF: 116% vs. SXOOF: 2%
Market capitalization -- MNXXF: $11.78M vs. SXOOF: $24.01M
MNXXF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $11.78M. SXOOF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $24.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNXXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSXOOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MNXXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SXOOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MNXXF and SXOOF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MNXXF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SXOOF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MNXXF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SXOOF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MNXXF is a better buy in the short-term than SXOOF.

Price Growth

MNXXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -3.61% price change this week, while SXOOF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +9.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SXOOF($24M) has a higher market cap than MNXXF($11.8M). MNXXF YTD gains are higher at: 76.000 vs. SXOOF (21.667). MNXXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -4.07M vs. SXOOF (-9.5M). MNXXF has more cash in the bank: 4.34M vs. SXOOF (3.86M). MNXXF has less debt than SXOOF: MNXXF (102K) vs SXOOF (11.2M). MNXXF (0) and SXOOF (0) have equivalent revenues.
MNXXFSXOOFMNXXF / SXOOF
Capitalization11.8M24M49%
EBITDA-4.07M-9.5M43%
Gain YTD76.00021.667351%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash4.34M3.86M112%
Total Debt102K11.2M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNXXF vs SXOOF: Fundamental Ratings
MNXXF
SXOOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5016
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10096
SMR RATING
1..100
9877
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6064
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9283
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNXXF's Valuation (77) in the null industry is in the same range as SXOOF (98). This means that MNXXF’s stock grew similarly to SXOOF’s over the last 12 months.

SXOOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as MNXXF (100). This means that SXOOF’s stock grew similarly to MNXXF’s over the last 12 months.

SXOOF's SMR Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as MNXXF (98). This means that SXOOF’s stock grew similarly to MNXXF’s over the last 12 months.

MNXXF's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as SXOOF (64). This means that MNXXF’s stock grew similarly to SXOOF’s over the last 12 months.

SXOOF's P/E Growth Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as MNXXF (92). This means that SXOOF’s stock grew similarly to MNXXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MNXXFSXOOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MNXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SXOOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSCMY0.55N/A
N/A
COSCO Shipping International (Singapore) Co., Ltd.
DACHF8.52N/A
N/A
Daicel Chemical Industries Ltd.
AILIM73.55N/A
N/A
Ameren Illinois Company
NXGPF166.80N/A
N/A
Next Group Plc
AMEGF0.38-0.01
-2.37%
AMERICAN EAGLE GOLD CORP.

MNXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNXXF and REMRF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNXXF and REMRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNXXF
1D Price
Change %
MNXXF100%
-1.35%
REMRF - MNXXF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
EMGDF - MNXXF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.00%
SXOOF - MNXXF
21%
Poorly correlated
+6.31%
MTLI - MNXXF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRRDF - MNXXF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.51%
More

SXOOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SXOOF and MNXXF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SXOOF and MNXXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SXOOF
1D Price
Change %
SXOOF100%
+6.31%
MNXXF - SXOOF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.35%
SRCAF - SXOOF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TLGRF - SXOOF
11%
Poorly correlated
-5.02%
SRLZF - SXOOF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCKRF - SXOOF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More