Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNWCX vs NLSIX
MNWCX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts MNWCX vs NLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$20.04
Change-$0.06 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.94B
MNWCX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNWCX vs. NLSIX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNWCX is a Hold and NLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.94B vs. MNWCX (38M). MNWCX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: MNWCX (0.08) vs NLSIX (0.02). MNWCX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: MNWCX (11 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). MNWCX (2.66) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). NLSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. MNWCX (11.00). MNWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: MNWCX (1000) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.04 vs. MNWCX (5.27). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 22.14 vs. MNWCX (14.32).
| MNWCX | NLSIX | MNWCX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 1.32 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.66 | 1.32 | 202% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.599 | 7.200 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38M | 7.94B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.08 | 0.02 | 404% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.27 | 6.04 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.88 | 21.20 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.32 | 22.14 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.85 | 65.96 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers