Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MNWCX vs NLSIX
MNWCX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts MNWCX vs NLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$20.11
Change+$0.04 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.96B
MNWCX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MNWCX vs. NLSIX commentary
Jan 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNWCX is a Hold and NLSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.96B vs. MNWCX (38.3M). NLSIX pays higher dividends than MNWCX: NLSIX (0.05) vs MNWCX (0.00). MNWCX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: MNWCX (12 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). MNWCX (2.66) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). NLSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. MNWCX (11.00). MNWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: MNWCX (1000) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX (6.34) and MNWCX (6.10) have marching annual gain over last year. NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 24.42 vs. MNWCX (16.19).
| MNWCX | NLSIX | MNWCX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 1.32 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.66 | 1.32 | 202% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.714 | 0.100 | 717% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.3M | 7.96B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.05 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.10 | 6.34 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.15 | 28.28 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.19 | 24.42 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.28 | 71.85 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement