MNTR
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
504.71K
NCPL
Price
$7.19
Change
+$1.51 (+26.58%)
Updated
Jun 30, 01:02 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.8M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MNTR vs NCPL

Header iconMNTR vs NCPL Comparison
Open Charts MNTR vs NCPLBanner chart's image
Mentor Capital
Price$0.04
Change-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Volume$12.29K
Capitalization504.71K
NETCAPITAL
Price$7.19
Change+$1.51 (+26.58%)
Volume$3.98K
Capitalization2.8M
MNTR vs NCPL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MNTR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NCPL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNTR vs. NCPL commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNTR is a Hold and NCPL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (MNTR: $0.04 vs. NCPL: $5.68)
Brand notoriety: MNTR and NCPL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNTR: 70% vs. NCPL: 298%
Market capitalization -- MNTR: $504.71K vs. NCPL: $2.8M
MNTR [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $504.71K. NCPL’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $2.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNTR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNCPL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MNTR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NCPL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NCPL is a better buy in the long-term than MNTR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MNTR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NCPL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MNTR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NCPL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NCPL is a better buy in the short-term than MNTR.

Price Growth

MNTR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +0.06% price change this week, while NCPL (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +37.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +7.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +101.58%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+7.78% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NCPL($2.8M) has a higher market cap than MNTR($505K). MNTR has higher P/E ratio than NCPL: MNTR (11.74) vs NCPL (0.25). NCPL YTD gains are higher at: 173.077 vs. MNTR (-41.953). MNTR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 135K vs. NCPL (-3.19M). NCPL has more cash in the bank: 2.17M vs. MNTR (863K). MNTR has less debt than NCPL: MNTR (1.71M) vs NCPL (2.44M). MNTR (8.03M) and NCPL (7.72M) have equivalent revenues.
MNTRNCPLMNTR / NCPL
Capitalization505K2.8M18%
EBITDA135K-3.19M-4%
Gain YTD-41.953173.077-24%
P/E Ratio11.740.254,769%
Revenue8.03M7.72M104%
Total Cash863K2.17M40%
Total Debt1.71M2.44M70%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNTR vs NCPL: Fundamental Ratings
MNTR
NCPL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5045
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9595
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8234
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
51100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NCPL's Valuation (74) in the null industry is in the same range as MNTR (100). This means that NCPL’s stock grew similarly to MNTR’s over the last 12 months.

NCPL's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MNTR (100). This means that NCPL’s stock grew similarly to MNTR’s over the last 12 months.

NCPL's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as MNTR (95). This means that NCPL’s stock grew similarly to MNTR’s over the last 12 months.

NCPL's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNTR (82). This means that NCPL’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNTR’s over the last 12 months.

MNTR's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCPL (100). This means that MNTR’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCPL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MNTRNCPL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MNTR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NCPL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
YALA6.880.20
+2.99%
Yalla Group Limited
TEF5.19N/A
N/A
Telefonica SA
AZTA30.59-0.18
-0.58%
Azenta
HITI2.26-0.04
-1.74%
High Tide
HUSA12.02-1.03
-7.89%
Houston American Energy Corp

MNTR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNTR and VIRT have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNTR and VIRT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNTR
1D Price
Change %
MNTR100%
-14.89%
VIRT - MNTR
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.53%
MNXBF - MNTR
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ICE - MNTR
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
ARBKF - MNTR
3%
Poorly correlated
+13.47%
NCPL - MNTR
3%
Poorly correlated
+20.08%
More

NCPL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NCPL and NMR have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NCPL and NMR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NCPL
1D Price
Change %
NCPL100%
+20.08%
NMR - NCPL
27%
Poorly correlated
+4.43%
SNEX - NCPL
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
MS - NCPL
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
SF - NCPL
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
JEF - NCPL
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
More