Advertisement
MNTK vs TNABF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNTK is a Buy and TNABF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MNTK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTNABF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- MNTK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TNABF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MNTK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TNABF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MNTK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- TNABF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MNTK (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +20.98% price change this week, while TNABF (@Electric Utilities) price change was +0.44% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +1.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.97%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.71%.
Reported Earning Dates
MNTK is expected to report earnings on Mar 18, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Specialty (+1.59% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
@Electric Utilities (-0.20% weekly)Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.
| MNTK | TNABF | MNTK / TNABF | |
| Capitalization | 246M | 20.7B | 1% |
| EBITDA | 20.6M | 9.66B | 0% |
| Gain YTD | 3.593 | 7.378 | 49% |
| P/E Ratio | 97.00 | 17.73 | 547% |
| Revenue | 161M | 64.5B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 6.77M | 14.6B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 73M | 88.3B | 0% |
TNABF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 49 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 48 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| MNTK | TNABF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 18% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 18% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 9 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 39% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ECML | 35.85 | 0.54 | +1.53% |
| Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF | |||
| NMCO | 10.74 | 0.05 | +0.47% |
| Nuveen Municipal Credit Opportunities Fund | |||
| FVD | 48.17 | 0.20 | +0.42% |
| First Trust Value Line® Dividend ETF | |||
| KHYB | 24.68 | -0.03 | -0.12% |
| KraneShares Asia Pacific Hi Inc USD ETF | |||
| XMAG | 22.99 | -0.09 | -0.37% |
| Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF | |||
MNTK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNTK has been loosely correlated with KWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNTK jumps, then KWR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNTK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNTK | 100% | +1.76% | ||
| KWR - MNTK | 47% Loosely correlated | +3.35% | ||
| IOSP - MNTK | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| SCL - MNTK | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.18% | ||
| CC - MNTK | 40% Loosely correlated | +6.03% | ||
| CBT - MNTK | 39% Loosely correlated | -2.15% | ||
More | ||||
TNABF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TNABF and TNABY have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TNABF and TNABY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TNABF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNABF | 100% | +1.63% | ||
| TNABY - TNABF | 15% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TEZNY - TNABF | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.93% | ||
| ABOIF - TNABF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TERRF - TNABF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MNTK - TNABF | -4% Poorly correlated | +1.76% |