MNST
Price
$62.46
Change
-$0.99 (-1.56%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
60.99B
54 days until earnings call
PEP
Price
$146.39
Change
-$0.50 (-0.34%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
200.42B
33 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MNST vs PEP

Header iconMNST vs PEP Comparison
Open Charts MNST vs PEPBanner chart's image
Monster Beverage
Price$62.46
Change-$0.99 (-1.56%)
Volume$3.34M
Capitalization60.99B
Pepsi
Price$146.39
Change-$0.50 (-0.34%)
Volume$7.19M
Capitalization200.42B
MNST vs PEP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MNST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PEP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNST vs. PEP commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNST is a StrongBuy and PEP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MNST: $62.46 vs. PEP: $146.39)
Brand notoriety: MNST: Not notable vs. PEP: Notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNST: 60% vs. PEP: 83%
Market capitalization -- MNST: $60.99B vs. PEP: $200.42B
MNST [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $60.99B. PEP’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $200.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $292.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $20.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNST’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePEP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MNST’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PEP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNST is a better buy in the long-term than PEP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MNST’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PEP’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MNST’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PEP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MNST is a better buy in the short-term than PEP.

Price Growth

MNST (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +0.08% price change this week, while PEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was -0.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +27.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +28.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

MNST is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

PEP is expected to report earnings on Oct 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+27.76% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEP($200B) has a higher market cap than MNST($61B). MNST has higher P/E ratio than PEP: MNST (38.80) vs PEP (26.66). MNST YTD gains are higher at: 18.836 vs. PEP (-0.852). MNST has less debt than PEP: MNST (199M) vs PEP (51.4B).
MNSTPEPMNST / PEP
Capitalization61B200B31%
EBITDA2.16BN/A-
Gain YTD18.836-0.852-2,210%
P/E Ratio38.8026.66145%
Revenue7.66BN/A-
Total Cash2.07BN/A-
Total Debt199M51.4B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNST vs PEP: Fundamental Ratings
MNST
PEP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7566
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3563
SMR RATING
1..100
3924
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3054
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2547
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PEP's Valuation (24) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is significantly better than the same rating for MNST (92). This means that PEP’s stock grew significantly faster than MNST’s over the last 12 months.

MNST's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PEP (63). This means that MNST’s stock grew similarly to PEP’s over the last 12 months.

PEP's SMR Rating (24) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MNST (39). This means that PEP’s stock grew similarly to MNST’s over the last 12 months.

MNST's Price Growth Rating (30) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PEP (54). This means that MNST’s stock grew similarly to PEP’s over the last 12 months.

MNST's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PEP (47). This means that MNST’s stock grew similarly to PEP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MNSTPEP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MNST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PEP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RARE.X0.0544970.001490
+2.81%
SuperRare cryptocurrency
MNSO24.520.44
+1.83%
MINISO Group Holding Limited
LOCO10.460.07
+0.67%
El Pollo Loco Holdings
MD17.070.06
+0.35%
Pediatrix Medical Group
REEF.X0.000299-0.000004
-1.19%
Reef cryptocurrency

MNST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNST has been loosely correlated with KDP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNST jumps, then KDP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNST
1D Price
Change %
MNST100%
-1.56%
KDP - MNST
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.05%
PEP - MNST
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.63%
CCEP - MNST
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.67%
KO - MNST
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
CELH - MNST
37%
Loosely correlated
-3.93%
More

PEP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PEP has been loosely correlated with KO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PEP jumps, then KO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PEP
1D Price
Change %
PEP100%
+0.63%
KO - PEP
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
KDP - PEP
55%
Loosely correlated
-2.05%
MNST - PEP
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.56%
FIZZ - PEP
42%
Loosely correlated
-3.19%
CCEP - PEP
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.67%
More